Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Aug 12;4(3):311-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2015.08.002. eCollection 2015 Sep.

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the older person: A systematic review

S J Moug  1 , K McCarthy  2 , J Coode-Bate  3 , M J Stechman  4 , J Hewitt  5
Affiliations
Review

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the older person: A systematic review

S J Moug et al. Ann Med Surg (Lond). .

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic surgery is being increasingly offered to the older person.

Objective: To systematically review the literature regarding laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in older people and compare to younger adult populations.

Study selection: We included randomized controlled trials that compared open to laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Older people were defined as being 65 years and above.

Outcome measures: Overall survival and post-operative morbidity and mortality. Secondary endpoints were length of hospital stay, wound recurrence, disease-free survival and conversion rate.

Results: Seven trials included older people, average age of approximately 70 years. Two reported data specific to older patients (over 70 years): The ALCCaS study reported reduced length of stay and short-term complication rates in the laparoscopic group when compared to open surgery (8 versus 10 days, and 36.7% versus 50.6% respectively) and the CLASICC study reported equivalent 5 year survival between arms and a reduction of 2 days length of stay following laparoscopic surgery in older people. In trials which considered data on older and younger participants all five trials reported comparable overall survival and showed comparable or reduced complication rates; two demonstrated significantly shorter length of stay following laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery.

Conclusion: Large numbers of older people have been included in well-conducted, multi-centre, randomized controlled trials for laparoscopic and open colorectal cancer surgery. This systematic review suggests that age itself should not be a factor when considering the best surgical option for older patients.

Keywords: Laparoscopic surgery; Older people; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer, including the reasons for exclusion.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kuhry E. Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2008;(2):CD003432. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reza M.M. Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br. J. Surg. 2006;93(8):921–928. - PubMed
    1. Schwenk W. Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2005;(3):CD003145. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schiphorst A.H. Representation of the elderly in trials of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16(12):976–983. - PubMed
    1. Jadad A.R. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin. Trials. 1996;17(1):1–12. - PubMed