Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;145(12):2639-45.
doi: 10.3945/jn.115.219634. Epub 2015 Oct 14.

Addressing Current Criticism Regarding the Value of Self-Report Dietary Data

Affiliations

Addressing Current Criticism Regarding the Value of Self-Report Dietary Data

Amy F Subar et al. J Nutr. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Recent reports have asserted that, because of energy underreporting, dietary self-report data suffer from measurement error so great that findings that rely on them are of no value. This commentary considers the amassed evidence that shows that self-report dietary intake data can successfully be used to inform dietary guidance and public health policy. Topics discussed include what is known and what can be done about the measurement error inherent in data collected by using self-report dietary assessment instruments and the extent and magnitude of underreporting energy compared with other nutrients and food groups. Also discussed is the overall impact of energy underreporting on dietary surveillance and nutritional epidemiology. In conclusion, 7 specific recommendations for collecting, analyzing, and interpreting self-report dietary data are provided: (1) continue to collect self-report dietary intake data because they contain valuable, rich, and critical information about foods and beverages consumed by populations that can be used to inform nutrition policy and assess diet-disease associations; (2) do not use self-reported energy intake as a measure of true energy intake; (3) do use self-reported energy intake for energy adjustment of other self-reported dietary constituents to improve risk estimation in studies of diet-health associations; (4) acknowledge the limitations of self-report dietary data and analyze and interpret them appropriately; (5) design studies and conduct analyses that allow adjustment for measurement error; (6) design new epidemiologic studies to collect dietary data from both short-term (recalls or food records) and long-term (food-frequency questionnaires) instruments on the entire study population to allow for maximizing the strengths of each instrument; and (7) continue to develop, evaluate, and further expand methods of dietary assessment, including dietary biomarkers and methods using new technologies.

Keywords: dietary assessment; dietary surveillance; energy intake; measurement error; nutritional epidemiology; underreporting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author disclosures: AF Subar, LS Freedman, JA Tooze, SI Kirkpatrick, C Boushey, ML Neuhouser, FE Thompson, N Potischman, PM Guenther, V Tarasuk, J Reedy, and SM Krebs-Smith, no conflicts of interest.

Comment in

References

    1. Archer E, Hand GA, Blair SN. Validity of U.S. nutritional surveillance: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey caloric energy intake data, 1971–2010. PLoS One 2013;8:e76632. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mitka M. Do flawed data on caloric intake from NHANES present problems for researchers and policy makers? JAMA 2013;310:2137–8. - PubMed
    1. Ioannidis JP. Implausible results in human nutrition research. BMJ 2013;347:f6698. - PubMed
    1. Dhurandhar NV, Schoeller D, Brown AW, Heymsfield SB, Thomas D, Sorensen TI, Speakman JR, Jeansonne M, Allison DB, Energy Balance Measurement Working G. Energy balance measurement: when something is not better than nothing. Int J Obes (Lond) 2015;39:1109–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Archer E, Pavela G, Lavie CJ. The inadmissibility of What We Eat in America and NHANES dietary data in nutrition and obesity research and the scientific formulation of national dietary guidelines. Mayo Clin Proc 2015;90:911–26. - PMC - PubMed