Long-Term Results Comparing Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix and Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafts With Coronally Advanced Flaps for Treatment of Dehiscence-Type Recession Defects
- PMID: 26469812
- DOI: 10.1902/jop.2015.150386
Long-Term Results Comparing Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix and Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafts With Coronally Advanced Flaps for Treatment of Dehiscence-Type Recession Defects
Abstract
Background: Although connective tissue grafts with coronally advanced flaps (CTG + CAF) have been deemed the gold standard for recession defect treatment, to provide adequate recession coverage, the periodontal profession continues to pursue lower-morbidity, patient-preferred substitutes that are more convenient and of unlimited supply.
Methods: Using a randomized, controlled, and masked contralateral comparison of matched-pair, within-patient recession defects, collagen matrix (CMX) + CAF therapy was compared with CTG + CAF at 6 months and 5 years. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage of root coverage (RC). Secondary efficacy parameters included width of keratinized tissue (KTw), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), clinician rating of color and texture compared with surrounding tissues, and patient esthetic satisfaction.
Results: Seventeen patients were available for the 5-year recall. Mean RC between 6 months and 5 years changed from 89.5% to 77.6% for CMX + CAF test sites and 97.5% to 95.5% for CTG + CAF control sites. KTw averaged >3 mm for both test and control sites at 5 years. PD was equivalent at all time points. The 6-month to 5-year changes for RC, KTw, and PD were not significantly different between therapies. CAL change from 6 months to 5 years was greater for CTG + CAF (0.26 mm) than CMX + CAF (-0.21 mm). Tissue color match to surrounding tissues remained similar for both therapies throughout the study. There was a difference in tissue texture at both 6 months and 5 years, with CMX + CAF sites tending to be "equally firm" and CTG + CAF sites "more firm." Patient satisfaction was high, with no statistical difference in satisfaction between therapies at any time point.
Conclusion: When balanced with patient-reported satisfaction, clinical rankings of esthetics, and control and historical RC results reported by other investigators, CMX + CAF appears to present a viable and long-term alternative to traditional CTG + CAF therapy.
Keywords: Biocompatible materials; collagen; connective tissue; gingival recession tissue grafts; tissue engineering.
Comment in
-
Letter to the Editor: Re: Long-Term Results Comparing Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix and Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafts With Coronally Advanced Flaps for Treatment of Dehiscence-Type Recession Defects.J Periodontol. 2016 Oct;87(10):1133. doi: 10.1902/jop.2016.160243. J Periodontol. 2016. PMID: 27677808 No abstract available.
-
Letter to the Editor: Authors' Response.J Periodontol. 2016 Oct;87(10):1133-4. doi: 10.1902/jop.2016.160272. J Periodontol. 2016. PMID: 27677809 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Xenogeneic collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap compared to connective tissue with coronally advanced flap for the treatment of dehiscence-type recession defects.J Periodontol. 2010 Aug;81(8):1108-17. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.090698. J Periodontol. 2010. PMID: 20350159 Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment of multiple adjacent Miller class I and II gingival recessions with a Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT) technique and a collagen matrix or palatal connective tissue graft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Jul;40(7):713-20. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12112. Epub 2013 Apr 30. J Clin Periodontol. 2013. PMID: 23627374 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of a harvest graft substitute for recession coverage and soft tissue volume augmentation: A randomized controlled trial.J Periodontol. 2022 Mar;93(3):333-342. doi: 10.1002/JPER.21-0131. Epub 2021 Aug 16. J Periodontol. 2022. PMID: 34287902 Clinical Trial.
-
Root coverage by coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft and/or enamel matrix derivative: a meta-analysis.J Periodontal Res. 2015 Apr;50(2):220-30. doi: 10.1111/jre.12199. Epub 2014 Jul 12. J Periodontal Res. 2015. PMID: 25039691 Review.
-
Efficacy of concentrated growth factor combined with coronally advanced flap in the treatment of gingival recession: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 9;25(1):508. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05890-x. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 40205617 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Marine Collagen Matrix Carrier with Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Management of Gingival Recession Defects.Case Rep Dent. 2023 Dec 6;2023:3357323. doi: 10.1155/2023/3357323. eCollection 2023. Case Rep Dent. 2023. PMID: 38093970 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix® versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Front Dent. 2020 Mar;17(5):1-8. doi: 10.18502/fid.v17i1.3965. Epub 2020 Mar 8. Front Dent. 2020. PMID: 33615303 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and patient-reported outcomes after recession coverage using modified vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access with a volume-stable collagen matrix as compared to a coronally advanced flap with a subepithelial connective tissue graft.J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2022 Dec;52(6):466-478. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2105760288. Epub 2022 Jul 27. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2022. PMID: 36468471 Free PMC article.
-
Cell Therapy Based on Gingiva-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Seeded in a Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix for Root Coverage of RT1 Gingival Lesions: An In Vivo Experimental Study.Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Mar 17;23(6):3248. doi: 10.3390/ijms23063248. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. PMID: 35328670 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparison between Mucoderm® and Connective Tissue Graft for Root Coverage.J Dent (Shiraz). 2022 Sep;23(2 Suppl):402-409. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.90830.1535. J Dent (Shiraz). 2022. PMID: 36588965 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical