Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Oct 15;10(10):e0140340.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140340. eCollection 2015.

Pacemaker Dependency after Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Pacemaker Dependency after Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence

Curtis M Steyers 3rd et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Severe postoperative conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker implantation frequently occur following cardiac surgery. Little is known about the long-term pacing requirements and risk factors for pacemaker dependency in this population.

Methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature addressing rates and predictors of pacemaker dependency in patients requiring permanent pacemaker implantation after cardiac surgery. Using a comprehensive search of the Medline, Web of Science and EMBASE databases, studies were selected for review based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results: A total of 8 studies addressing the endpoint of pacemaker-dependency were identified, while 3 studies were found that addressed the recovery of atrioventricular (AV) conduction endpoint. There were 10 unique studies with a total of 780 patients. Mean follow-up ranged from 6-72 months. Pacemaker dependency rates ranged from 32%-91% and recovery of AV conduction ranged from 16%-42%. There was significant heterogeneity with respect to the definition of pacemaker dependency. Several patient and procedure-specific variables were found to be independently associated with pacemaker dependency, but these were not consistent between studies.

Conclusions: Pacemaker dependency following cardiac surgery occurs with variable frequency. While individual studies have identified various perioperative risk factors for pacemaker dependency and non-resolution of AV conduction disease, results have been inconsistent. Well-conducted studies using a uniform definition of pacemaker dependency might identify patients who will benefit most from early permanent pacemaker implantation after cardiac surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flowsheet for selection of included studies (PRISMA).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying cardiac conduction system disease and recovery.

References

    1. Peretto G, Durante A, Limite LR, Cianflone D. Postoperative arrhythmias after cardiac surgery: incidence, risk factors, and therapeutic management. Cardiology research and practice. 2014;2014:615987 10.1155/2014/615987 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elahi MM, Lee D, Dhannapuneni RR. Predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation during the early postoperative period after valve surgery. Texas Heart Institute journal / from the Texas Heart Institute of St Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Texas Children's Hospital. 2006;33(4):455–7. Epub 2007/01/12. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc1764945. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Batra AS, Wells WJ, Hinoki KW, Stanton RA, Silka MJ. Late recovery of atrioventricular conduction after pacemaker implantation for complete heart block associated with surgery for congenital heart disease. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2003;125(6):1291–3. Epub 2003/06/28. . - PubMed
    1. Rene AG, Sastry A, Horowitz JM, Cheung J, Liu CF, Thomas G, et al. Recovery of Atrioventricular Conduction After Pacemaker Placement Following Cardiac Valvular Surgery. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 2013;24(12):1383–7. 10.1111/jce.12260 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms