Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct 16:5:15262.
doi: 10.1038/srep15262.

Antigenically Modified Human Pluripotent Stem Cells Generate Antigen-Presenting Dendritic Cells

Affiliations

Antigenically Modified Human Pluripotent Stem Cells Generate Antigen-Presenting Dendritic Cells

Jieming Zeng et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) provide a promising platform to produce dendritic cell (DC) vaccine. To streamline the production process, we investigated a unique antigen-loading strategy that suits this novel platform. Specifically, we stably modified hPSCs using tumour antigen genes in the form of a full-length tumour antigen gene or an artificial tumour antigen epitope-coding minigene. Such antigenically modified hPSCs were able to differentiate into tumour antigen-presenting DCs. Without conventional antigen-loading, DCs derived from the minigene-modified hPSCs were ready to prime a tumour antigen-specific T cell response and further expand these specific T cells in restimulation processes. These expanded tumour antigen-specific T cells were potent effectors with central memory or effector memory phenotype. Thus, we demonstrated that immunocompetent tumour antigen-loaded DCs can be directly generated from antigenically modified hPSCs. Using such strategy, we can completely eliminate the conventional antigen-loading step and significantly simplify the production of DC vaccine from hPSCs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Tumour antigen gene-modified hPSCs produce tumour antigen-expressing DCs.
(a) Structure of lentivector LV.MP carrying a tumour antigen gene MART-1. (b) GPF expression in H1.MP cells, a H1 cell line generated by LV.MP transduction and G418 selection, as detected by flow cytometry. (c,d) MART-1 expression in H1.MP cells as measured by RT-PCR (c) and immunostaining (d). (e) GFP expression in H1.MP-derived DCs (H1.MP-DCs) as detected by flow cytometry. (f) MART-1 expression in H1.MP-DCs as measured by RT-PCR.
Figure 2
Figure 2. DCs derived from tumour antigen gene-modified hPSCs present tumour antigen.
(a) Proliferation of GFPhigh H1.MP cells after sorting. (b) GFP expression in sorted GFPhigh H1.MP cells as detected by flow cytometry. (c,d) MART-1 expression in GFPhigh H1.MP cells as measured by RT-PCR (c) and immunostaining (d). (e) Expansion of primed MART-1-specific CD8+ T cells by GFPhigh H1.MP-derived DCs (GFPhigh H1.MP-DCs) as detected by pentamer staining and flow cytometry.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Modification of hPSCs with tumour antigen epitope-coding minigene.
(a) Structure of lentivector LV.ME carrying MART-1 epitope-coding minigene. (b) GPF expression in H1.ME cells, a H1 cell line generated by LV.ME transduction and G418 selection, as detected by flow cytometry. (c) Minigene expression in H1.ME cells as measured by RT-PCR. (d) SSEA-4 expression in H1.ME as detected by immunostaining.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Tumour antigen epitope-coding minigene is expressed in DCs derived from minigene-modified hPSCs.
(a–c) Morphology (a), yield (b) and phenotype (c) of DCs derived from minigene-modified hPSCs (H1.ME-DCs). The statistical significance of difference was determined by two-sided Student’s t-test (mean ± SD, n = 10) in (b). (d) GFP expression in H1.ME-DCs as detected by flow cytometry. (e) Expression of MART-1 epitope-coding minigene in H1.ME-DCs as measured by RT-PCR. (f) CD83 expression on H1.ME-DCs after treatment with TNF. (g) Allostimulatory function of H1.ME-DCs on CD4+ T cells after treatment with TNF. The percentages of divided CD4+ T cells are indicated.
Figure 5
Figure 5. DCs derived from minigene-modified hPSCs efficiently prime tumour antigen-specific T cell response.
(a) Induction of MART-1-specific CD8+ T cell response by H1-DCs pulsed with MART-1 peptide of various concentrations. (b,c) Induction of MART-1-specific CD8+ T cell response by H1.ME-DCs in low-responsive PBLs. The antigen-specific T cells were stained by pentamer and detected by flow cytometry nine days after DC/PBL coculture. (b) Contour plots of a representative experiment. The numbers in plots indicate the percentage of pentamer+ CD8+ cells in total T cells. (c) Quantitative analysis of the experiments. The statistical significance of differences were determined by two-sided Student’s t-test (mean ± SD, n = 6). (d,e) Induction of MART-1-specific CD8+ T cell response by H1.ME-DCs in high-responsive PBLs. (f) Comparing T cell priming ability of H1.ME-DCs and MART-1 peptide-pulsed moDCs. The statistical significance of difference was determined by two-sided Student’s t-test (mean ± SD, n = 5). (g) Comparing T cell priming ability of MART-1 peptide-pulsed H1-DCs and H1.ME-DCs after prolonged culture. H1-DCs were pulsed with MART-1 peptide, washed and further cultured for seven days before applying for priming. Unpulsed H1-DCs and H1.ME-DCs were employed as controls. (h) Induction of MART-1-specific CD8+ T cell response by H1.ME-DCs using different DC:PBL ratios.
Figure 6
Figure 6. CTLs expanded by DCs derived from minigene-modified hPSCs are immunocompetent.
(a) Expansion of MART-1-specific CD8+ T cells by H1.ME-DCs in bulk culture. HLA-A2+ PBLs were primed and then restimulated twice with H1.ME-DCs. MART-1-specific T cell expansion during this process was monitored by flow cytometry at the indicated time points. The percentages of pentamer+ CD8+ cells in total T cells are shown in the representative contour plots. (b) Phenotype of MART-1-specific T cells expanded by H1.ME-DCs. (c) GrB secretion by MART-1-specific T cells expanded by H1.ME-DCs as measured by ELISPOT. The statistical significance of difference was determined by two-sided Student’s t-test (mean ± SD, n = 3). (d) Specific cytotoxicity of MART-1-specific T cells expanded by H1.ME-DCs. The statistical significance of difference was determined by two-sided Student’s t-test (mean ± SD, n = 3, *p < 0.002).
Figure 7
Figure 7. Schematic summary of a novel antigen-loading strategy for DC vaccine production from hPSCs.
In a traditional patient blood cell-dependent platform, antigen-loading is limited to DCs, wherein antigen payloads in various forms are delivered into DCs by conventional antigen-loading approaches. In an hPSC-DC platform, antigen-loading can be done in hPSCs other than DCs by antigenically modifying the hPSCs. From such antigenically modified hPSCs, antigen-loaded DCs can be generated without a conventional antigen-loading step. Using this novel antigen-loading strategy, there are no more requirements of clinical-grade payload production and additional DC manipulation. Thus, DC vaccine production from hPSCs is significantly simplified.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Galluzzi L. et al. Trial watch: Dendritic cell-based interventions for cancer therapy. Oncoimmunology 1, 1111–1134 (2012). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vacchelli E. et al. Trial watch: Dendritic cell-based interventions for cancer therapy. Oncoimmunology 2, e25771 (2013). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Butterfield L. H. Dendritic cells in cancer immunotherapy clinical trials: are we making progress? Front Immunol 4, 454 (2013). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gilboa E. DC-based cancer vaccines. J Clin Invest 117, 1195–1203 (2007). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nicolette C. A. et al. Dendritic cells for active immunotherapy: optimizing design and manufacture in order to develop commercially and clinically viable products. Vaccine 25 Suppl 2, B47–60 (2007). - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms