Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct 15;15(1):126.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0111-x.

Detection of HPV in oral rinse samples from OPSCC and non-OPSCC patients

Affiliations

Detection of HPV in oral rinse samples from OPSCC and non-OPSCC patients

Juliet Dang et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: Due to the increasing rates of oropharyngeal cancer, oral HPV infection is a significant concern. Methods for detecting oral HPVs is not standardized as there are different techniques available. We propose that use of oral rinse samples to detect for HPVs is a suitable technique within a clinic setting. Thus, our main objective is to study HPV detection in oral rinse samples.

Methods: In our study, we used oral rinse sample collection coupled with real-time PCR to detect for HPVs types 16 and 18, and preferentially amplified FAP PCR samples to detect for a broad range of HPVs, in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), non-OPSCC, and healthy patients.

Results: Thirty three percent of 100 cancer patients were positive for any type of HPV; of those 23 were positive for HPV16. Only 1 of 110 healthy controls was positive (this subject was positive for HPV18).

Conclusion: Our results indicate that HPV detection in oral rinse samples may be useful as a screening tool to detect HPV-associated oral cancers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
FAP PCR results on an electrophoresis gel. An expected band of ~480 bp indicates an HPV positive sample
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparison of HPV16 viral load (copies/ng DNA) between the two cancer groups. No statistically significant difference was seen (p = 0.40). The gray boxes demonstrate range from lower to upper quartiles. The median is represented by a horizontal line. Maximum and minimum values are indicated by the vertical lines. Viral load variation between each group was demonstrated. The median viral load in OPSCC was slightly higher than non-OPSCC cases

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Westra WH. Detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) in clinical samples: evolving methods and strategies for the accurate determination of HPV status of head and neck carcinomas. Oral Oncol. 2014;50(9):771–779. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.05.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garcia-Closas M, Egan KM, Abruzzo J, Newcomb PA, Titus-Ernstoff L, Franklin T, Bender PK, Beck JC, Le Marchand L, Lum A, et al. Collection of genomic DNA from adults in epidemiological studies by buccal cytobrush and mouthwash. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2001;10(6):687–696. - PubMed
    1. Holmes BJ, Westra WH. The expanding role of cytopathology in the diagnosis of HPV-related squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Diagn Cytopathol. 2014;42(1):85–93. doi: 10.1002/dc.23014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fakhry C, Rosenthal BT, Clark DP, Gillison ML. Associations between oral HPV16 infection and cytopathology: evaluation of an oropharyngeal “pap-test equivalent” in high-risk populations. Cancer Prev Res. 2011;4(9):1378–1384. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0284. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lingen MW. Brush-based cytology screening in the tonsils and cervix: there is a difference! Cancer Prev Res. 2011;4(9):1350–1352. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0373. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources