Impact of Modified 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines on HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer. One Year Experience
- PMID: 26473483
- PMCID: PMC4608798
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140652
Impact of Modified 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines on HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer. One Year Experience
Abstract
Introduction: The latest guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) to test Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) in breast cancer after being revised in 2008 underwent a second modification in October 2013. The modification includes changes in cut-offs: 10% strong membranous staining for score 3+ on immunohistochemistry (IHC) (previously 30%) and using the ratio of >2 or absolute gene-copy-number (6 or more) alone or in combination with each other by in-situ-hybridisation technology (previously >2.2 and average copy-number of 6 or more). Hereby we addressed the question, which impact the modified cut-offs had on overall HER2-positivity in a single institution.
Methods: We prospectively analysed 617 consecutive diagnostic breast-cancer cases which underwent double HER2 testing by immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in-situ hybridisation (FISH), using the modified 2013 ASCO/CAP-guidelines for one year (October 2013-October 2014). Results were compared with HER2-test results on 1,528 consecutive diagnostic breast-cancer cases from two previous years (2011-2012), using the 2008 ASCO/CAP guidelines, also tested with IHC and FISH in each case.
Results: Between October 2013 and October 2014, overall HER2-positivity was 15.8% (98 of 617 cases were either IHC 3+ or FISH amplified). 79 of 617 cases (13%) were IHC 3+, 96 of 617 cases (15.5%) were FISH amplified. Equivocal cases were seen in 25 of 617 cases (4.1%). 22 of 25 equivocal cases (88%) in 2013-2014 were IHC 1+ or 2+. In 13 equivocal cases, there was a repeated IHC/FISH testing: 2 of 13 cases (15%) became FISH amplified, 1 of 13 cases (7.5%) became IHC 3+. In 2011-2012, overall HER2-positivity (IHC/FISH) was 13.8% (211 of 1,528 cases). 185 of 1,528 cases (12%) were 3+ on IHC, 181 of 1,522 cases (12%) were amplified by FISH. Six of 1,528 cases were equivocal by FISH, and interpreted as non-amplified (0.3%).
Conclusions: Applying the modified ASCO/CAP guidelines from 2013 resulted in an increase (2%) in overall HER2-positivity rate compared to overall-HER2-positivity rate using the 2008 ASCO/CAP guidelines. The increased positivity rate was mainly due to more FISH-positive cases (3.5% more than until 2013). The high rate of equivocal cases (4.1%) did not contribute to increase in overall HER2-positivity, but resulted in delay in definitive HER2-status.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Impact of the updated 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 FISH testing in invasive breast cancer: a retrospective study of HER2 fish results of 2233 cases.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 May;175(1):51-57. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05148-5. Epub 2019 Feb 2. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019. PMID: 30712197
-
Updated 2013 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) testing increase HER2 positive and HER2 equivocal breast cancer cases; retrospective study of HER2 FISH results of 836 invasive breast cancers.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Jun;157(3):405-11. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3824-x. Epub 2016 May 14. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016. PMID: 27180259
-
Analysis of molecular subtypes for the increased HER2 equivocal cases caused by application of the updated 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Nov;166(1):77-84. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4397-z. Epub 2017 Jul 15. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017. PMID: 28712009
-
Rate of reclassification of HER2-equivocal breast cancer cases to HER2-negative per the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines and response of HER2-equivocal cases to anti-HER2 therapy.PLoS One. 2020 Nov 12;15(11):e0241775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241775. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33180796 Free PMC article. Review.
-
American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists 2018 Focused Update of Breast Cancer HER2 FISH Testing GuidelinesResults From a National Reference Laboratory.Am J Clin Pathol. 2019 Sep 9;152(4):479-485. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqz061. Am J Clin Pathol. 2019. PMID: 31172196 Review.
Cited by
-
Precise ERBB2 copy number assessment in breast cancer by means of molecular inversion probe array analysis.Oncotarget. 2016 Dec 13;7(50):82733-82740. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12421. Oncotarget. 2016. PMID: 27716627 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges and future of biomarker tests in the era of precision oncology: Can we rely on immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to select the optimal patients for matched therapy?Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 1;8(59):100863-100898. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19809. eCollection 2017 Nov 21. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID: 29246028 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Combining Neratinib with CDK4/6, mTOR, and MEK Inhibitors in Models of HER2-positive Cancer.Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Mar 15;27(6):1681-1694. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3017. Epub 2021 Jan 7. Clin Cancer Res. 2021. PMID: 33414137 Free PMC article.
-
HER2 overexpression and correlation with other significant clinicopathologic parameters in Ivorian breast cancer women.BMC Clin Pathol. 2019 Jan 17;19:1. doi: 10.1186/s12907-018-0081-4. eCollection 2019. BMC Clin Pathol. 2019. PMID: 30675127 Free PMC article.
-
ErbB Family Signalling: A Paradigm for Oncogene Addiction and Personalized Oncology.Cancers (Basel). 2017 Apr 12;9(4):33. doi: 10.3390/cancers9040033. Cancers (Basel). 2017. PMID: 28417948 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Lebeau A, Turzynski A, Braun S, Behrhof W, Fleige B, Schmitt WD, et al. Reliability of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry in breast core needle biopsies. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2010;28(20):3264–70. 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.9366 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN, Hagerty KL, Allred DC, Cote RJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2007;25(1):118–45. 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.2775 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2013;31(31):3997–4013. 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.9984 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lebeau A, Deimling D, Kaltz C, Sendelhofert A, Iff A, Luthardt B, et al. Her-2/neu analysis in archival tissue samples of human breast cancer: comparison of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2001;19(2):354–63. Epub 2001/02/24. . - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous