EHR Adoption and Hospital Performance: Time-Related Effects
- PMID: 26473506
- PMCID: PMC4693851
- DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12406
EHR Adoption and Hospital Performance: Time-Related Effects
Abstract
Objective: To assess whether, 5 years into the HITECH programs, national data reflect a consistent relationship between EHR adoption and hospital outcomes across three important dimensions of hospital performance.
Data sources/study setting: Secondary data from the American Hospital Association and CMS (Hospital Compare and EHR Incentive Programs) for nonfederal, acute-care hospitals (2009-2012).
Study design: We examined the relationship between EHR adoption and three hospital outcomes (process adherence, patient satisfaction, efficiency) using ordinary least squares models with hospital fixed effects. Time-related effects were assessed through comparing the impact of EHR adoption pre (2008/2009) versus post (2010/2011) meaningful use and by meaningful use attestation cohort (2011, 2012, 2013, Never). We used a continuous measure of hospital EHR adoption based on the proportion of electronic functions implemented.
Data collection/extraction methods: We created a panel dataset with hospital-year observations.
Principal findings: Higher levels of EHR adoption were associated with better performance on process adherence (0.147; p < .001) and patient satisfaction (0.118; p < .001), but not efficiency (0.01; p = .78). For all three outcomes, there was a stronger, positive relationship between EHR adoption and performance in 2010/2011 compared to 2008/2009. We found mixed results based on meaningful use attestation cohort.
Conclusions: Performance gains associated with EHR adoption are apparent in more recent years. The large national investment in EHRs appears to be delivering more consistent benefits than indicated by earlier national studies.
Keywords: Health care organizations and systems; hospitals; information technology.
© Health Research and Educational Trust.
Figures

Notes: Outcome values are predicted at 0.42 and 0.77 on our EHR adoption scale (the average of hospitals with less than basic EHR and at least basic EHR, respectively), with all control variables set at their mean.
Similar articles
-
Leveraging EHRs to improve hospital performance: the role of management.Am J Manag Care. 2014 Nov;20(11 Spec No. 17):SP511-9. Am J Manag Care. 2014. PMID: 25811825
-
Sequencing of EHR adoption among US hospitals and the impact of meaningful use.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):984-91. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002708. Epub 2014 May 22. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014. PMID: 24853066 Free PMC article.
-
Electronic health record adoption and health information exchange among hospitals in New York State.J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Dec;18(6):1156-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01755.x. Epub 2011 Sep 13. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012. PMID: 21914089
-
Factors associated with adoption of health information technology: a conceptual model based on a systematic review.JMIR Med Inform. 2014 May 23;2(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/medinform.3106. JMIR Med Inform. 2014. PMID: 25599673 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of a comprehensive EHR based on the DeLone and McLean model for IS success: approach, results, and success factors.Int J Med Inform. 2013 Oct;82(10):940-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.05.010. Epub 2013 Jul 1. Int J Med Inform. 2013. PMID: 23827768 Review.
Cited by
-
Value of Electronic Health Records Measured Using Financial and Clinical Outcomes: Quantitative Study.JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Jan 24;12:e52524. doi: 10.2196/52524. JMIR Med Inform. 2024. PMID: 38265848 Free PMC article.
-
Analyzing Unnecessary Imaging for Low Back Pain in Nebraska from a Statewide Health Information Exchange.J Med Syst. 2022 Jun 9;46(7):51. doi: 10.1007/s10916-022-01838-8. J Med Syst. 2022. PMID: 35678939
-
Does participation in health information exchange improve hospital efficiency?Health Care Manag Sci. 2018 Sep;21(3):426-438. doi: 10.1007/s10729-017-9396-4. Epub 2017 Feb 24. Health Care Manag Sci. 2018. PMID: 28236178 Free PMC article.
-
Transitions from One Electronic Health Record to Another: Challenges, Pitfalls, and Recommendations.Appl Clin Inform. 2020 Oct;11(5):742-754. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718535. Epub 2020 Nov 11. Appl Clin Inform. 2020. PMID: 33176389 Free PMC article.
-
The value of connected health information: perceptions of electronic health record users in Canada.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jul 16;16:93. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0330-3. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016. PMID: 27422571 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adler‐Milstein, J. , DesRoches C. M., Furukawa M. F., Worzala C., Charles D., Kralovec P., Stalley S., and Jha A. K.. 2014. “More Than Half of US Hospitals Have At Least a Basic EHR, but Stage 2 Criteria Remain Challenging for Most.” Health Affairs 33: 1664–71. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0453. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Blumenthal, D. 2010. “Launching HITECH.” New England Journal of Medicine 362 (5): 382–5. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical