Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Dec;35(6):706-10.
doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000416.

Early Symptom Improvement as a Predictor of Response to Extended Release Quetiapine in Major Depressive Disorder

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Early Symptom Improvement as a Predictor of Response to Extended Release Quetiapine in Major Depressive Disorder

Roger S McIntyre et al. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

The aim of this post-hoc analysis was to determine whether early symptom improvement with extended release quetiapine (quetiapine XR) may predict treatment outcome in patients with major depressive disorder. Data were from 6, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of quetiapine XR (2 fixed-dose and 2 flexible-dose monotherapy and 2 adjunct studies) in adult patients with major depressive disorder. Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Clinical Global Impression-Severity Score (CGI-S) were assessed at baseline, weeks 2, 4, and 6. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) was assessed at baseline and week 6. The MADRS improvement at week 2 (15%, 20%, 25%, 30%) was used to predict response and remission, based on MADRS (50% improvement; total score ≤ 12) or HAM-D (50% improvement; total score ≤ 7). The CGI-S improvement (1 point) at week 2 was used to predict final outcome (CGI-S score ≤ 2). The predictive value for early improvement with quetiapine XR was found to be "very strong" (Yule's Q coefficient, a combined measure of sensitivity and specificity) using 30% MADRS improvement as the threshold. This was relatively comparable for response and remission and for fixed-dose, flexible-dose, and adjunct studies. This was also observed for placebo. Exceptions were: adjunct studies (where predictivity was lower for ongoing antidepressant/placebo), and for remission (predictivity for remission appeared lower than for response with placebo). In conclusion, outcome at week 6 with quetiapine XR for a major depressive episode could be predicted by 30% improvement after 2 weeks, a finding that could give doctors confidence to continue treatment and may facilitate adherence in patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00320268 NCT00321490 NCT00326105 NCT00326144 NCT00351169 NCT00351910.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Predictive value for treatment response (≥50% reduction in MADRS total score) or remission (MADRS total score ≤ 12) to quetiapine XR, according to the level of improvement at week 2 (% reduction in MADRS total score): fixed dose, flexible dose, or as an adjunctive treatment in MDD.

References

    1. Pae CU, Wang SM, Lee SY, et al. Early switch strategy in patients with major depressive disorder. Expert Rev Neurother. 2012; 12: 1185– 1188. - PubMed
    1. Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, et al. Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice. Am J Psychiatry. 2006; 163: 28– 40. - PubMed
    1. Connolly KR, Thase ME. If at first you don't succeed: a review of the evidence for antidepressant augmentation, combination and switching strategies. Drugs. 2011; 71: 43– 64. - PubMed
    1. Kudlow PA, Cha DS, McIntyre RS. Predicting treatment response in major depressive disorder: the impact of early symptomatic improvement. Can J Psychiatry. 2012; 57: 782– 788. - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder, Third edition (2010). October, 2010. Available at: http://www.psychiatryonline.com/pracGuide/pracGuideTopic_7.aspx. Accessed September 24, 2015.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data