Early Symptom Improvement as a Predictor of Response to Extended Release Quetiapine in Major Depressive Disorder
- PMID: 26474010
- PMCID: PMC4898901
- DOI: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000416
Early Symptom Improvement as a Predictor of Response to Extended Release Quetiapine in Major Depressive Disorder
Abstract
The aim of this post-hoc analysis was to determine whether early symptom improvement with extended release quetiapine (quetiapine XR) may predict treatment outcome in patients with major depressive disorder. Data were from 6, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of quetiapine XR (2 fixed-dose and 2 flexible-dose monotherapy and 2 adjunct studies) in adult patients with major depressive disorder. Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Clinical Global Impression-Severity Score (CGI-S) were assessed at baseline, weeks 2, 4, and 6. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) was assessed at baseline and week 6. The MADRS improvement at week 2 (15%, 20%, 25%, 30%) was used to predict response and remission, based on MADRS (50% improvement; total score ≤ 12) or HAM-D (50% improvement; total score ≤ 7). The CGI-S improvement (1 point) at week 2 was used to predict final outcome (CGI-S score ≤ 2). The predictive value for early improvement with quetiapine XR was found to be "very strong" (Yule's Q coefficient, a combined measure of sensitivity and specificity) using 30% MADRS improvement as the threshold. This was relatively comparable for response and remission and for fixed-dose, flexible-dose, and adjunct studies. This was also observed for placebo. Exceptions were: adjunct studies (where predictivity was lower for ongoing antidepressant/placebo), and for remission (predictivity for remission appeared lower than for response with placebo). In conclusion, outcome at week 6 with quetiapine XR for a major depressive episode could be predicted by 30% improvement after 2 weeks, a finding that could give doctors confidence to continue treatment and may facilitate adherence in patients.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00320268 NCT00321490 NCT00326105 NCT00326144 NCT00351169 NCT00351910.
Figures
References
-
- Pae CU, Wang SM, Lee SY, et al. Early switch strategy in patients with major depressive disorder. Expert Rev Neurother. 2012; 12: 1185– 1188. - PubMed
-
- Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, et al. Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice. Am J Psychiatry. 2006; 163: 28– 40. - PubMed
-
- Connolly KR, Thase ME. If at first you don't succeed: a review of the evidence for antidepressant augmentation, combination and switching strategies. Drugs. 2011; 71: 43– 64. - PubMed
-
- Kudlow PA, Cha DS, McIntyre RS. Predicting treatment response in major depressive disorder: the impact of early symptomatic improvement. Can J Psychiatry. 2012; 57: 782– 788. - PubMed
-
- American Psychiatric Association. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder, Third edition (2010). October, 2010. Available at: http://www.psychiatryonline.com/pracGuide/pracGuideTopic_7.aspx. Accessed September 24, 2015.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
