Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct 15;5(10):e008708.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008708.

Patients' perspectives on the medical primary-secondary care interface: systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research

Affiliations

Patients' perspectives on the medical primary-secondary care interface: systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research

Rod Sampson et al. BMJ Open. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Objectives: To synthesise the published literature on the patient experience of the medical primary-secondary care interface and to determine priorities for future work in this field aimed at improving clinical outcomes.

Design: Systematic review and metaethnographic synthesis of primary studies that used qualitative methods to explore patients' perspectives of the medical primary-secondary care interface.

Setting: International primary-secondary care interface.

Data sources: EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus with Full text, PsycINFO, Psychology and Behavioural Sciences Collection, Health Business Elite, Biomedica Reference Collection: Comprehensive Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts, eBook Collection, Web of Science Core Collection: Citation Indexes and Social Sciences Citation Index, and grey literature.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were full research papers employing qualitative methodology to explore patients' perspectives of the medical primary-secondary care interface.

Review methods: The 7-step metaethnographic approach described by Noblit and Hare, which involves cross-interpretation between studies while preserving the context of the primary data.

Results: The search identified 690 articles, of which 39 were selected for full-text review. 20 articles were included in the systematic review that encompassed a total of 689 patients from 10 countries. 4 important areas specific to the primary-secondary care interface from the patients' perspective emerged: barriers to care, communication, coordination, and 'relationships and personal value'.

Conclusions and implications of key findings: Patients should be the focus of any transfer of care between primary and secondary systems. From their perspective, areas for improvement may be classified into four domains that should usefully guide future work aimed at improving quality at this important interface.

Trial registration number: PROSPERO CRD42014009486.

Keywords: PRIMARY CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of search.

References

    1. Fry J. Considerations of the present state and future trends of primary, personal, family, and general medical care. Int J Health Serv 1972;2:159–324. - PubMed
    1. Saltman RB, Rico A, Boerma W, eds. Primary care in the driver's seat? Organisational reform in European primary care. Open University Press, 2006.
    1. Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK et al. . Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ 2003;327:1219–21. 10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1219 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hesselink G, Vernooij-Dassen M, Pijnenborg L et al. . Organizational culture: an important context for addressing and improving hospital to community patient discharge. Med Care 2013;51:90–8. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827632ec - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grimshaw JM, Winkens RA, Shirran L et al. . Interventions to improve outpatient referrals from primary care to secondary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;3:CD005471 10.1002/14651858.CD005471 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources