Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug 14;3(3):786-807.
doi: 10.3390/ani3030786.

The Effect of Steps to Promote Higher Levels of Farm Animal Welfare across the EU. Societal versus Animal Scientists' Perceptions of Animal Welfare

Affiliations

The Effect of Steps to Promote Higher Levels of Farm Animal Welfare across the EU. Societal versus Animal Scientists' Perceptions of Animal Welfare

Xavier Averós et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Information about animal welfare standards and initiatives from eight European countries was collected, grouped, and compared to EU welfare standards to detect those aspects beyond minimum welfare levels demanded by EU welfare legislation. Literature was reviewed to determine the scientific relevance of standards and initiatives, and those aspects going beyond minimum EU standards. Standards and initiatives were assessed to determine their strengths and weaknesses regarding animal welfare. Attitudes of stakeholders in the improvement of animal welfare were determined through a Policy Delphi exercise. Social perception of animal welfare, economic implications of upraising welfare levels, and differences between countries were considered. Literature review revealed that on-farm space allowance, climate control, and environmental enrichment are relevant for all animal categories. Experts' assessment revealed that on-farm prevention of thermal stress, air quality, and races and passageways' design were not sufficiently included. Stakeholders considered that housing conditions are particularly relevant regarding animal welfare, and that animal-based and farm-level indicators are fundamental to monitor the progress of animal welfare. The most notable differences between what society offers and what farm animals are likely to need are related to transportation and space availability, with economic constraints being the most plausible explanation.

Keywords: European Union; animal welfare; animal welfare initiative; societal perceptions; standards.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Seng P.M., Laporte R. Animal welfare: The role and perspectives of the meat and livestock sector. Rev. Sci. Tech. OIE. 2005;24:613–623. - PubMed
    1. Whay H.R. The journey to animal welfare improvement. Anim. Welfare. 2007;16:117–122.
    1. Aparicio M.A., Vargas J.D. Considerations on ethics and animal welfare in extensive pig production: Breeding and fattening Iberian pigs. Livest. Sci. 2006;103:237–242. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2006.05.010. - DOI
    1. Cauldfield M.P., Cambridge H. The questionable value of some science-based ‘welfare’ assessments in intensive animal farming: Sow stalls as an illustrative example. Aust. Vet. J. 2008;86:446–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2008.00338.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Animal Welfare—EU Action Plan, Evaluation and the Second Strategy on Animal Welfare. 2011. [(accessed on 15 February 2013)]. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/actionplan/actionplan_en.htm.

LinkOut - more resources