The Effect of Steps to Promote Higher Levels of Farm Animal Welfare across the EU. Societal versus Animal Scientists' Perceptions of Animal Welfare
- PMID: 26479534
- PMCID: PMC4494436
- DOI: 10.3390/ani3030786
The Effect of Steps to Promote Higher Levels of Farm Animal Welfare across the EU. Societal versus Animal Scientists' Perceptions of Animal Welfare
Abstract
Information about animal welfare standards and initiatives from eight European countries was collected, grouped, and compared to EU welfare standards to detect those aspects beyond minimum welfare levels demanded by EU welfare legislation. Literature was reviewed to determine the scientific relevance of standards and initiatives, and those aspects going beyond minimum EU standards. Standards and initiatives were assessed to determine their strengths and weaknesses regarding animal welfare. Attitudes of stakeholders in the improvement of animal welfare were determined through a Policy Delphi exercise. Social perception of animal welfare, economic implications of upraising welfare levels, and differences between countries were considered. Literature review revealed that on-farm space allowance, climate control, and environmental enrichment are relevant for all animal categories. Experts' assessment revealed that on-farm prevention of thermal stress, air quality, and races and passageways' design were not sufficiently included. Stakeholders considered that housing conditions are particularly relevant regarding animal welfare, and that animal-based and farm-level indicators are fundamental to monitor the progress of animal welfare. The most notable differences between what society offers and what farm animals are likely to need are related to transportation and space availability, with economic constraints being the most plausible explanation.
Keywords: European Union; animal welfare; animal welfare initiative; societal perceptions; standards.
Similar articles
-
The European Market for Animal-Friendly Products in a Societal Context.Animals (Basel). 2013 Aug 14;3(3):808-29. doi: 10.3390/ani3030808. Animals (Basel). 2013. PMID: 26479535 Free PMC article.
-
Dairy cattle welfare - the relative effect of legislation, industry standards and labelled niche production in five European countries.Animal. 2023 Dec;17(12):101009. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.101009. Epub 2023 Oct 12. Animal. 2023. PMID: 37952301
-
Review: Space allowance for growing pigs: animal welfare, performance and on-farm practicality.Animal. 2024 Jun;18 Suppl 1:100890. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100890. Epub 2023 Jun 22. Animal. 2024. PMID: 37451903 Review.
-
Formulating policies for the welfare of animals during long distance transportation.Vet Ital. 2008 Jan-Mar;44(1):71-86. Vet Ital. 2008. PMID: 20405414
-
Integrating practical, regulatory and ethical strategies for enhancing farm animal welfare.Aust Vet J. 2001 Nov;79(11):762-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2001.tb10895.x. Aust Vet J. 2001. PMID: 11789912 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of Space Allowance on Pig Performance, Carcass Traits and Meat Quality in Italian Heavy Pigs Reared Under Two Housing Systems.Foods. 2025 Aug 14;14(16):2817. doi: 10.3390/foods14162817. Foods. 2025. PMID: 40870728 Free PMC article.
-
Milk Quality and Animal Welfare as a Possible Marketing Lever for the Economic Development of Rural Areas in Southern Italy.Animals (Basel). 2021 Apr 8;11(4):1059. doi: 10.3390/ani11041059. Animals (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33918038 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of dietary interaction of sodium bentonite and litter treated with aluminum sulfate on growth performance, litter quality and serum biochemical indices of Nigerian Noiler birds.Trop Anim Health Prod. 2025 May 30;57(5):237. doi: 10.1007/s11250-025-04482-9. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2025. PMID: 40445429
-
The European Market for Animal-Friendly Products in a Societal Context.Animals (Basel). 2013 Aug 14;3(3):808-29. doi: 10.3390/ani3030808. Animals (Basel). 2013. PMID: 26479535 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of Improved Microclimate Conditions on Growth and Physiological Performance of Two Japanese Quail Lines.Animals (Basel). 2023 Mar 22;13(6):1118. doi: 10.3390/ani13061118. Animals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36978658 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Seng P.M., Laporte R. Animal welfare: The role and perspectives of the meat and livestock sector. Rev. Sci. Tech. OIE. 2005;24:613–623. - PubMed
-
- Whay H.R. The journey to animal welfare improvement. Anim. Welfare. 2007;16:117–122.
-
- Aparicio M.A., Vargas J.D. Considerations on ethics and animal welfare in extensive pig production: Breeding and fattening Iberian pigs. Livest. Sci. 2006;103:237–242. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2006.05.010. - DOI
-
- Animal Welfare—EU Action Plan, Evaluation and the Second Strategy on Animal Welfare. 2011. [(accessed on 15 February 2013)]. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/actionplan/actionplan_en.htm.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources