Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec 10;126(24):2578-84.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-06-649111. Epub 2015 Oct 19.

Long-term survival and T-cell kinetics in relapsed/refractory ALL patients who achieved MRD response after blinatumomab treatment

Affiliations

Long-term survival and T-cell kinetics in relapsed/refractory ALL patients who achieved MRD response after blinatumomab treatment

Gerhard Zugmaier et al. Blood. .

Abstract

This long-term follow-up analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) in a phase 2 study of the bispecific T-cell engager antibody construct blinatumomab in 36 adults with relapsed/refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In the primary analysis, 25 (69%) patients with relapsed/refractory ALL achieved complete remission with full (CR) or partial (CRh) hematologic recovery of peripheral blood counts within the first 2 cycles. Twenty-five patients (69%) had a minimal residual disease (MRD) response (<10(-4) blasts), including 22 CR/CRh responders, 2 patients with hypocellular bone marrow, and 1 patient with normocellular bone marrow but low peripheral counts. Ten of the 36 patients (28%) were long-term survivors (OS ≥30 months). Median OS was 13.0 months (median follow-up, 32.6 months). MRD response was associated with significantly longer OS (Mantel-Byar P = .009). All 10 long-term survivors had an MRD response. Median RFS was 8.8 months (median follow-up, 28.9 months). A plateau for RFS was reached after ∼18 months. Six of the 10 long-term survivors remained relapse-free, including 4 who received allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) as consolidation for blinatumomab and 2 who received 3 additional cycles of blinatumomab instead of allo-SCT. Three long-term survivors had neurologic events or cytokine release syndrome, resulting in temporary blinatumomab discontinuation; all restarted blinatumomab successfully. Long-term survivors had more pronounced T-cell expansion than patients with OS <30 months.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition. Of the 36 patients in the study, 25 achieved CR or CRh and 11 patients did not achieve CR/CRh. Furthermore, 25 patients achieved an MRD response and 11 patients did not achieve an MRD response. Although numerically identical, the MRD response subgroups overlapped but were not the same as the CR/CRh response subgroups.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Probability of OS. (A) OS in the entire patient population (N = 36) at a median follow-up of 32.6 months. *Two patients who were alive at the last follow-up at 29.7 and >29.9 months were censored at these visits and were considered to have an OS of ≥30 months after rounding to the nearest whole number. (B) Simon-Makuch analysis of OS in patients with and without MRD response. (C) OS with and without prior allo-SCT in the entire patient population (N = 36) at a median follow-up of 32.6 months. HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Probability of RFS. RFS among responders (n = 25) at a median follow-up of 28.9 months.
Figure 4
Figure 4
T-cell and B-cell kinetics during cycle 1 (day 1 to 29) and cycle 2 (day 43 to 71) of blinatumomab treatment. (A) CD3+ T-cell expansion. (B) CD3+ TEM-cell expansion. (C) CD19+ B-cell depletion. Patients were grouped according to MRD response and duration of OS (<30 vs ≥30 months). Data shown are median cell values (interquartile range) with numbers of evaluable data points per patient subgroup at each time point given below. For clarity, initial T-cell redistribution during the first treatment week of cycles 1 and 2 is not shown.

References

    1. Tavernier E, Boiron JM, Huguet F, et al. GET-LALA Group; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research SAKK; Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group. Outcome of treatment after first relapse in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia initially treated by the LALA-94 trial. Leukemia. 2007;21(9):1907–1914. - PubMed
    1. Oriol A, Vives S, Hernández-Rivas JM, et al. Programa Español de Tratamiento en Hematologia Group. Outcome after relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adult patients included in four consecutive risk-adapted trials by the PETHEMA Study Group. Haematologica. 2010;95(4):589–596. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fielding AK, Richards SM, Chopra R, et al. Medical Research Council of the United Kingdom Adult ALL Working Party; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Outcome of 609 adults after relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); an MRC UKALL12/ECOG 2993 study. Blood. 2007;109(3):944–950. - PubMed
    1. Kantarjian HM, Thomas D, Ravandi F, et al. Defining the course and prognosis of adults with acute lymphocytic leukemia in first salvage after induction failure or short first remission duration. Cancer. 2010;116(24):5568–5574. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gökbuget N, Stanze D, Beck J, et al. German Multicenter Study Group for Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Outcome of relapsed adult lymphoblastic leukemia depends on response to salvage chemotherapy, prognostic factors, and performance of stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2012;120(10):2032–2041. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms