Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec 10;25(4):287-98.
doi: 10.1002/cbm.1977.

Dyadic violence and readiness to change among male intimate partner violence offenders

Affiliations

Dyadic violence and readiness to change among male intimate partner violence offenders

Cory A Crane et al. Crim Behav Ment Health. .

Abstract

Background: Although readiness to change is associated with mandated partner violence treatment compliance and subsequent violent behaviour among male offenders (e.g. Scott and Wolfe, 2003; Eckhardt et al., 2004), our understanding of the factors associated with pretreatment change remains limited. Offender research indicates that individual and dyadic violent behaviour are highly variable and that such variability may provide insight into levels of pretreatment change (Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart, 1994; Archer, 2002).

Aims/hypotheses: We sought to examine the associations between indicators of change and individual as well as dyadic violence frequency in a sample of male partner violence offenders.

Method: To determine whether severity and perceived concordance in the use of violence among male offenders and their female partners influenced readiness to change at pretreatment, 82 recently adjudicated male perpetrators of intimate partner violence were recruited into the current study and administered measures of readiness to change violent behaviour (Revised Safe at Home Scale; Begun et al., 2008) as well as partner violence experiences (Revised Conflict Tactics Scale; Straus et al., 1996).

Results: Analyses revealed an interaction between offender-reported male and female violence in the prediction of pretreatment readiness to change such that greater male violence was associated with greater readiness to change among males who reported that their female partners perpetrated low, but not high, levels of violence. Consistently, greater female violence was associated with lower readiness to change only among the most violent male offenders.

Conclusions and implications for clinical practice: Results provide support for the assertion that the most violent offenders may be the most resistant to partner violence intervention efforts, particularly when they perceive themselves to be victims as well. Enhanced motivational and couples programming may facilitate treatment engagement among the high-risk group of male offenders who report concordant relationship violence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The interaction of male and female perpetrated violence in the prediction of overall readiness to change scores.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The interaction of male and female perpetrated violence in the prediction of precontemplation and preparation / action stages of change scores.

Similar articles

References

    1. Aiken L, West S. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1991.
    1. Alexander PC, Morris E. Stages of change in batterers and their response to treatment. Violence and Victims. 2008;23:476–492. - PubMed
    1. Archer J. Sex differences in physically aggressive acts between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2002;7:313–351.
    1. Babcock JC, Canady BE, Senior A, Eckhardt CI. Applying the transtheoretical model to female and male perpetrators of intimate partner violence: Gender differences in stages and processes of change. Violence and Victims. 2005;20:235–250. - PubMed
    1. Babcock JC, Green CE, Robie C. Does batterers' treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review. 2004;23:1023–1053. - PubMed

Publication types