Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jan;13(1):41-54.
doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.173. Epub 2015 Oct 20.

Population genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: founder mutations to genomes

Affiliations
Review

Population genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: founder mutations to genomes

William D Foulkes et al. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

The current standard model for identifying carriers of high-risk mutations in cancer-susceptibility genes (CSGs) generally involves a process that is not amenable to population-based testing: access to genetic tests is typically regulated by health-care providers on the basis of a labour-intensive assessment of an individual's personal and family history of cancer, with face-to-face genetic counselling performed before mutation testing. Several studies have shown that application of these selection criteria results in a substantial proportion of mutation carriers being missed. Population-based genetic testing has been proposed as an alternative approach to determining cancer susceptibility, and aims for a more-comprehensive detection of mutation carriers. Herein, we review the existing data on population-based genetic testing, and consider some of the barriers, pitfalls, and challenges related to the possible expansion of this approach. We consider mechanisms by which population-based genetic testing for cancer susceptibility could be delivered, and suggest how such genetic testing might be integrated into existing and emerging health-care structures. The existing models of genetic testing (including issues relating to informed consent) will very likely require considerable alteration if the potential benefits of population-based genetic testing are to be fully realized.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Feb 4;160(3):145 - PubMed
    1. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jun;133(2):735-40 - PubMed
    1. Genet Test. 2001 Fall;5(3):201-11 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Feb 18;160(4):271-81 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1998 Aug 13;339(7):424-8 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances