Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep 30:6:1489.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01489. eCollection 2015.

Cognitive foundations of organizational learning: re-introducing the distinction between declarative and non-declarative knowledge

Affiliations

Cognitive foundations of organizational learning: re-introducing the distinction between declarative and non-declarative knowledge

Barbara Kump et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Contemporary research into socio-cognitive foundations of organizational learning tends to disregard the distinction between declarative and non-declarative knowledge. By reviewing the literature from organizational learning research and cognitive psychology we explain that this distinction is crucial. We describe the foundations of organizational learning by referring to models that consider the interplay between individual and collective knowledge-related processes in organizations. We highlight the existence of a research gap resulting from the finding that these approaches have widely neglected the existence of different types of knowledge. We then elaborate on characteristics of declarative and non-declarative knowledge in general, consider organizations as structures of distributed cognition, and discuss the relationship between organizational knowledge and practice. Subsequently, we examine the role of declarative and non-declarative knowledge in the context of organizational learning. Here, we analyze (1) the cognitive and social mechanisms underlying the development of declarative and non-declarative knowledge within structures of distributed cognition; and (2) the relationship between alterations in declarative and non-declarative types of knowledge on the one hand and changes in organizational practice on the other. Concluding, we discuss implications of our analysis for organizational learning research. We explain how our integrative perspective may offer starting points for a refined understanding of the sub-processes involved in organizational learning and unlearning and may support a better understanding of practical problems related to organizational learning and change.

Keywords: co-evolution; declarative knowledge; habits; non-declarative knowledge; organizational learning; organizational practice; organizational routines; skills.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The co-evolution of individual and collective declarative knowledge.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The co-evolution of individual and collective non-declarative knowledge.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
The interplay of declarative and non-declarative types of knowledge with practice.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adriaanse M. A., Kroese F. M., Gillebaart M., De Ridder D. (2014). Effortless inhibition: habit mediates the relation between self-control and unhealthy snack consumption. Front. Psychol. 5:444 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00444 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akgün A. E., Lynn G. S., Byrne J. C. (2003). Organizational learning: a socio-cognitive framework. Hum. Relat. 56 839–868. 10.1177/00187267030567004 - DOI
    1. Anderson J. R. (1982). Aquisition of cognitive skill. Psychol. Rev. 89 369–406. 10.1037/0033-295X.89.4.369 - DOI
    1. Anderson J. R. (1996). ACT: a simple theory of complex cognition. Am. Psychol. 514 355–365. 10.1037/0003-066X.51.4.355 - DOI
    1. Antonacopoulou E., Chiva R. (2007). The social complexity of organizational learning: the dynamics of learning and organizing. Manag. Learn. 38 277–295. 10.1177/1350507607079029 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources