Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov;41(11):483-91.
doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41063-3.

Reductions in Sepsis Mortality and Costs After Design and Implementation of a Nurse-Based Early Recognition and Response Program

Affiliations

Reductions in Sepsis Mortality and Costs After Design and Implementation of a Nurse-Based Early Recognition and Response Program

Stephen L Jones et al. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a leading cause of death, but evidence suggests that early recognition and prompt intervention can save lives. In 2005 Houston Methodist Hospital prioritized sepsis detection and management in its ICU. In late 2007, because of marginal effects on sepsis death rates, the focus shifted to designing a program that would be readily used by nurses and ensure early recognition of patients showing signs suspicious for sepsis, as well as the institution of prompt, evidence-based interventions to diagnose and treat it.

Methods: The intervention had four components: organizational commitment and data-based leadership; development and integration of an early sepsis screening tool into the electronic health record; creation of screening and response protocols; and education and training of nurses. Twice-daily screening of patients on targeted units was conducted by bedside nurses; nurse practitioners initiated definitive treatment as indicated. Evaluation focused on extent of implementation, trends in inpatient mortality, and, for Medicare beneficiaries, a before-after (2008-2011) comparison of outcomes and costs. A federal grant in 2012 enabled expansion of the program.

Results: By year 3 (2011) 33% of inpatients were screened (56,190 screens in 9,718 unique patients), up from 10% in year 1 (2009). Inpatient sepsis-associated death rates decreased from 29.7% in the preimplementation period (2006-2008) to 21.1% after implementation (2009-2014). Death rates and hospital costs for Medicare beneficiaries decreased from preimplementation levels without a compensatory increase in discharges to postacute care.

Conclusion: This program has been associated with lower inpatient death rates and costs. Further testing of the robustness and exportability of the program is under way.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. A Lowess plot was graphed to show a smoothed estimate of the month-over-month death rate; 2006–2008 was the preimplementation period; program implementation began in 2009

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Vital Statistics System: Leading Causes of Death. [Accessed Oct 1, 2015]; http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/LCWK9_2013.pdf. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Vital Statistics System, National Center for Health Statistics. Ten Leading Causes of Death and Injury by Age Group, United States—2013. [Accessed Oct 1, 2015]; http://www.cdc.gov/injury/images/lc-charts/leading_causes_of_death_by_ag.... - PubMed
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. HCUP Statistical Brief 160. Torio CM, Andrews RM. [Accessed Sep 24, 2015];National Inpatient Hospital Costs: The Most Expensive Conditions by Payer, 2011. 2013 Aug; http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb160.pdf. - PubMed
    1. Rangel-Frausto MS, et al. The natural history of the systemic Inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). A prospective study. JAMA. 1995 Jan 11;273(2):117–123. - PubMed
    1. Dellinger RP, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(2):580–637. - PubMed

Publication types