Considerations in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices at End of Life
- PMID: 26484996
- DOI: 10.1097/NCI.0000000000000111
Considerations in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices at End of Life
Abstract
Since the introduction of implantable cardiac pacemakers in 1958 and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in 1980, these devices have been proven to save and prolong lives. Pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy are deemed life-sustaining therapies. Despite these life-saving technologies, all patients ultimately will reach the end of their lives from either their heart disease or development of a terminal illness. Clinicians may be faced with patient and family requests to withdraw these life-sustaining therapies. The purpose of this article is to educate clinicians about the legal and ethical principles that underlie withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies such as device deactivation and to highlight the importance of proactive communication with patients and families in these situations.
Similar articles
-
Ethical and legal views regarding deactivation of cardiac implantable electrical devices in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Am J Cardiol. 2011 Apr 1;107(7):1071-1075.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.036. Epub 2011 Feb 4. Am J Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21296323 Free PMC article.
-
Deactivation of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Nov-Dec;55(3):290-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2012.09.003. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2012. PMID: 23217433 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Withdrawal of cardiac medications and devices.AACN Adv Crit Care. 2007 Oct-Dec;18(4):415-25. doi: 10.1097/01.AACN.0000298634.45653.81. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2007. PMID: 17978616 Review.
-
Should implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and permanent pacemakers in patients with terminal illness be deactivated? Deactivating implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and permanent pacemakers in patients with terminal illness. An ethical distinction.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009 Jun;2(3):336-9; discussion 339. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.821975. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009. PMID: 19808484 No abstract available.
-
Ethical considerations for discontinuing pacemakers and automatic implantable cardiac defibrillators at the end-of-life.Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013 Apr;26(2):171-5. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32835e8349. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013. PMID: 23403711 Review.
Cited by
-
The difficult discussion on the deactivation of implantable cardioverter devices at the end of life: a systematic review.ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Apr;12(2):733-760. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14831. Epub 2024 May 13. ESC Heart Fail. 2025. PMID: 38741255 Free PMC article.
-
Use and impact of the ANA Code: a scoping review.Nurs Ethics. 2024 Dec;31(8):1389-1412. doi: 10.1177/09697330241230522. Epub 2024 Feb 7. Nurs Ethics. 2024. PMID: 38324468 Free PMC article.
-
Decision-Making of Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators at End of Life: Family Members' Experiences.Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Jul;34(6):518-523. doi: 10.1177/1049909116641622. Epub 2016 Mar 31. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017. PMID: 27034436 Free PMC article.
-
Evolution of Wearable Devices with Real-Time Disease Monitoring for Personalized Healthcare.Nanomaterials (Basel). 2019 May 29;9(6):813. doi: 10.3390/nano9060813. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31146479 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical