Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2016 Jan;59(1):208-216.
doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3785-3.

Death, end-stage renal disease and renal function decline in patients with diabetic nephropathy in French cohorts of type 1 and type 2 diabetes

Affiliations
Observational Study

Death, end-stage renal disease and renal function decline in patients with diabetic nephropathy in French cohorts of type 1 and type 2 diabetes

Samy Hadjadj et al. Diabetologia. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: Microvascular complications are a common feature of diabetes but additional research is needed regarding diabetic nephropathy endpoints in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Methods: We compared 277 type 1 diabetes patients with 942 type 2 diabetes patients, with clinical proteinuria and no endstage renal disease (ESRD) at baseline, prospectively followed for death, ESRD and decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, all available measures).

Results: The incidence rate of death was 67.0 (95% CI 59.2, 74.8) vs. 24.6 (95% CI, 19.0, 30.2) per 1,000 patient-years, in type 2 diabetes and type 1 diabetes, respectively. Unadjusted risk for death was greater for type 2 diabetes patients (HR 3.423; 95% CI, 2.501, 4.683; p<0.0001), but the difference did not persist after adjustment for age (HRage-adj 0.859; 95% CI 0.581, 1.269; p=0.445). The incidence rate of ESRD was 18.4 (95% CI 14.2, 22.5) vs. 47.1 (95%CI 38.4, 55.9) per 1,000 patient-years, in type 2 diabetes and type 1 diabetes, respectively. Unadjusted risk for ESRD was lower in type 2 diabetes (HR 0.399; 95% CI 0.287, 0.554; p<0.0001), but the difference did not persist after adjustment for sex, age and baseline serum creatinine (HRadj 0.989; 95% CI 0.597, 1.639; p=0.965). In a mixed linear model, eGFR decline was not significantly different in type 2 vs. type 1 diabetes (difference in slope −0.19 [0.28] ml min(−1) 1.73 m(−2) year(−1); p=0.512).

Conclusions/interpretation: In diabetic nephropathy, once baseline risk factors were taken into account the risk for death, ESRD and renal function decline did not significantly differ between type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Diabetes Care. 2014 May;37(5):1425-31 - PubMed
    1. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1989;4(10):859-63 - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Care. 2004 Nov;27(11):2661-8 - PubMed
    1. Kidney Int. 2003 Jan;63(1):225-32 - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Care. 2000 Dec;23(12):1860-2 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources