Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct 20;5(10):e009742.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009742.

Diagnostic accuracy of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for detecting major depression in pregnant and postnatal women: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analyses

Affiliations

Diagnostic accuracy of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for detecting major depression in pregnant and postnatal women: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analyses

Brett D Thombs et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Studies of the diagnostic accuracy of depression screening tools often used data-driven methods to select optimal cut-offs. Typically, these studies report results from a small range of cut-off points around whatever cut-off score is identified as most accurate. When published data are combined in meta-analyses, estimates of accuracy for different cut-off points may be based on data from different studies, rather than data from all studies for each cut-off point. Thus, traditional meta-analyses may exaggerate accuracy estimates. Individual patient data (IPD) meta-analyses synthesise data from all studies for each cut-off score to obtain accuracy estimates. The 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is commonly recommended for depression screening in the perinatal period. The primary objective of this IPD meta-analysis is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the EPDS to detect major depression among women during pregnancy and in the postpartum period across all potentially relevant cut-off scores, accounting for patient factors that may influence accuracy (age, pregnancy vs postpartum).

Methods and analysis: Data sources will include Medline, Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Studies that include a diagnosis of major depression based on a validated structured or semistructured clinical interview administered within 2 weeks of (before or after) the administration of the EPDS will be included. Risk of bias will be assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis will be conducted for the full range of plausible cut-off values. Analyses will evaluate data from pregnancy and the postpartum period separately, as well as combining data from all women in a single model.

Ethics and dissemination: This study does not require ethics approval. Dissemination will include journal articles and presentations to policymakers, healthcare providers and researchers.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO 2015:CRD42015024785.

Keywords: MENTAL HEALTH; PSYCHIATRY.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kessler RC. Epidemiology of women and depression . J Affect Disord 2003;74:5–13. 10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00426-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gaynes BN, Gavin N, Meltzer-Brody S et al. . Perinatal Depression: Prevalence, Screening Accuracy, and Screening Outcomes. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 119. (Prepared by the RTI-University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center, under Contract No. 290-02-0016.) AHRQ Publication No. 05-E006-2. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. February 2005. - PMC - PubMed
    1. O'Hara MW, Swain AM. Rates and risk of postpartum depression-a meta-analysis . Int Rev Psychiatr 1996;8:37–54. 10.3109/09540269609037816 - DOI
    1. Gavin NI, Gaynes BN, Lohr KN et al. . Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence . Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:1071–83. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000183597.31630.db - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bennett HA, Einarson A, Taddio A et al. . Prevalence of depression during pregnancy: systematic review . Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:698–709. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000116689.75396.5f - DOI - PubMed

Publication types