Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep-Oct;23(5):806-13.
doi: 10.1590/0104-1169.0456.2618.

Postoperative self-efficacy and psychological morbidity in radical prostatectomy

[Article in English, Portuguese, Spanish]
Affiliations

Postoperative self-efficacy and psychological morbidity in radical prostatectomy

[Article in English, Portuguese, Spanish]
Luciana Regina Ferreira da Mata et al. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2015 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Objective: evaluate the general and perceived self-efficacy, psychological morbidity, and knowledge about postoperative care of patients submitted to radical prostatectomy. Identify the relationships between the variables and know the predictors of self-efficacy.

Method: descriptive, cross-sectional study, conducted with 76 hospitalized men. The scales used were the General and Perceived Self-efficacy Scale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, in addition to sociodemographic, clinical and knowledge questionnaires.

Results: a negative relationship was found for self-efficacy in relation to anxiety and depression. Psychological morbidity was a significant predictor variable for self-efficacy. An active professional situation and the waiting time for surgery also proved to be relevant variables for anxiety and knowledge, respectively.

Conclusion: participants had a good level of general and perceived self-efficacy and small percentage of depression. With these findings, it is possible to produce the profile of patients about their psychological needs after radical prostatectomy and, thus, allow the nursing professionals to act holistically, considering not only the need for care of physical nature, but also of psychosocial nature.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Knoll N, Scholz U, Burkert S, Roigas J, Gralla O. Effects of received and mobilized support on recipients' and providers' self-efficacy beliefs: A 1 year follow-up study with patients receiving radical prostatectomy and their spouses. Int J Psychol. 2009;44(2):129–137. - PubMed
    1. Inman DM, Maxson PM, Johnson KM, Myers RP, Holland DE. The impact of follow-up educational telephone calls on patients after radical prostatectomy: Finding value in low-margin activities. Urol Nurs. 2011;31(2):83–91.
    1. Mehnert A, Lehmann C, Graefen M, Huland H, Koch U. Depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder and health-related quality of life and its association with social support in ambulatory prostate cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care. 2010;19(1):736–745. - PubMed
    1. Botega NJ, Pondé MP, Medeiros P, Lima MG, Guerreiro CAM. Validação da escala hospitalar de ansiedade e depressão (HADS) em pacientes epilépticos ambulatoriais. J Bras Psiquiatr. 1998;47(6):285–289.
    1. Korfage IJ, Essink-Bot ML, Janssens ACJW, Schroder FH, Koning HJ. Anxiety and depression after prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment: 5-year follow-up. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:1093–1098. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types