Endoscopic hemostasis for peptic ulcer bleeding: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials
- PMID: 26487199
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4542-x
Endoscopic hemostasis for peptic ulcer bleeding: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Background: Peptic ulcer represents the most common cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopic therapy can reduce the risks of rebleeding, continued bleeding, need for surgery, and mortality. The objective of this review is to compare the different modalities of endoscopic therapy.
Methods: Studies were identified by searching electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, LILACS, DARE, and CINAHL. We selected randomized clinical trials that assessed contemporary endoscopic hemostatic techniques. The outcomes evaluated were: initial hemostasis, rebleeding rate, need for surgery, and mortality. The possibility of publication bias was evaluated by funnel plots. An additional analysis was made, including only the higher-quality trials.
Results: Twenty-eight trials involving 2988 patients were evaluated. Injection therapy alone was inferior to injection therapy with hemoclip and with thermal coagulation when evaluating rebleeding and the need for emergency surgery. Hemoclip was superior to injection therapy in terms of rebleeding; there were no statistically significant differences between hemoclip alone and hemoclip with injection therapy. There was considerable heterogeneity in the comparisons between hemoclip and thermal coagulation. There were no statistically significant differences between thermal coagulation and injection therapy, though their combination was superior, in terms of rebleeding, to thermal coagulation alone.
Conclusions: Injection therapy should not be used alone. Hemoclip is superior to injection therapy, and combining hemoclip with an injectate does not improve hemostatic efficacy above hemoclip alone. Thermal coagulation has similar efficacy as injection therapy; combining these appears to be superior to thermal coagulation alone. Therefore, we recommend the application of hemoclips or the combined use of injection therapy with thermal coagulation for the treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding.
Keywords: Endoscopic hemostasis; Endoscopy; Gastrointestinal hemorrhage; Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding; Peptic ulcer.
Similar articles
-
Endoscopic hemostasis in peptic ulcer bleeding for patients with high-risk lesions: a series of meta-analyses.Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Apr;69(4):786-99. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.031. Epub 2009 Jan 18. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009. PMID: 19152905
-
Endoscopic clipping for acute nonvariceal upper-GI bleeding: a meta-analysis and critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials.Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Aug;68(2):339-51. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.03.1122. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008. PMID: 18656600
-
Dual therapy versus monotherapy in the endoscopic treatment of high-risk bleeding ulcers: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Feb;102(2):279-89; quiz 469. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.01023.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007. PMID: 17311650
-
H. pylori eradication therapy vs. antisecretory non-eradication therapy (with or without long-term maintenance antisecretory therapy) for the prevention of recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(2):CD004062. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004062.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004. PMID: 15106235
-
H. pylori eradication therapy vs. antisecretory non-eradication therapy (with or without long-term maintenance antisecretory therapy) for the prevention of recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(4):CD004062. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004062. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(2):CD004062. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004062.pub2. PMID: 14584003 Updated.
Cited by
-
Hemospray® (hemostatic powder TC-325) as monotherapy for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter prospective study.Ann Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul-Aug;37(4):418-426. doi: 10.20524/aog.2024.0897. Epub 2024 Jun 20. Ann Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 38974074 Free PMC article.
-
Management of Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Guideline Recommendations From the International Consensus Group.Ann Intern Med. 2019 Dec 3;171(11):805-822. doi: 10.7326/M19-1795. Epub 2019 Oct 22. Ann Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31634917 Free PMC article.
-
Haemorrhagic cholecystitis in a young patient, complicated by gallbladder perforation and choledocholithiasis.BMJ Case Rep. 2023 Oct 29;16(10):e257389. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2023-257389. BMJ Case Rep. 2023. PMID: 37899077
-
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for uncontrollable nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.World J Emerg Surg. 2016 May 20;11:20. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0076-3. eCollection 2016. World J Emerg Surg. 2016. PMID: 27213011 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and Efficacy of the Noncessation Method of Antithrombotic Agents after Emergency Endoscopic Hemostasis in Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Multicenter Pilot Study.Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 May 21;2021:6672440. doi: 10.1155/2021/6672440. eCollection 2021. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021. PMID: 34095017 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical