Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1989:90:134-9.

Clinical use of high frequency ventilation

Affiliations
  • PMID: 2648732
Review

Clinical use of high frequency ventilation

J J Rouby et al. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1989.

Abstract

High-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) and high-frequency positive pressure ventilation (HFPPV) occupy a specific place in the wide range of ventilatory support techniques available for anesthesia and critical care. In anesthesia, HFJV and HFPPV have been proved to be superior to conventional ventilation in ENT surgery, laryngoscopies, laser surgery, bronchoscopies, surgery of the upper airways, surgical resection of aneurysms involving the thoracic descending aorta, vocal cord surgery, microsurgery for superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery anastomosis and lithotripsy. In intensive care, HFJV and HFPPV offer some advantages over conventional ventilation with PEEP in the presence of acute respiratory failure with circulatory shock, acute ventricular failure, bronchopleural fistula with large airleak flows and tracheal lesions secondary to tracheostomy or prolonged intubation. In many other clinical situations HFJV and HFPPV have produced results identical with those obtained with conventional ventilation. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma are absolute contra-indications to both techniques because overdistension and/or hypoventilation occur in the presence of increased respiratory compliance and/or elevated bronchial resistance. In unilateral lung disease HFJV and HFPPV offer no advantage over conventional ventilation.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources