Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May 15;3(2):401-15.
doi: 10.3390/ani3020401.

The Future of Pork Production in the World: Towards Sustainable, Welfare-Positive Systems

Affiliations

The Future of Pork Production in the World: Towards Sustainable, Welfare-Positive Systems

John J McGlone. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Among land animals, more pork is eaten in the world than any other meat. The earth holds about one billion pigs who deliver over 100 mmt of pork to people for consumption. Systems of pork production changed from a forest-based to pasture-based to dirt lots and finally into specially-designed buildings. The world pork industry is variable and complex not just in production methods but in economics and cultural value. A systematic analysis of pork industry sustainability was performed. Sustainable production methods are considered at three levels using three examples in this paper: production system, penning system and for a production practice. A sustainability matrix was provided for each example. In a comparison of indoor vs. outdoor systems, the food safety/zoonoses concerns make current outdoor systems unsustainable. The choice of keeping pregnant sows in group pens or individual crates is complex in that the outcome of a sustainability assessment leads to the conclusion that group penning is more sustainable in the EU and certain USA states, but the individual crate is currently more sustainable in other USA states, Asia and Latin America. A comparison of conventional physical castration with immunological castration shows that the less-common immunological castration method is more sustainable (for a number of reasons). This paper provides a method to assess the sustainability of production systems and practices that take into account the best available science, human perception and culture, animal welfare, the environment, food safety, worker health and safety, and economics (including the cost of production and solving world hunger). This tool can be used in countries and regions where the table values of a sustainability matrix change based on local conditions. The sustainability matrix can be used to assess current systems and predict improved systems of the future.

Keywords: animal welfare; pigs; sustainable.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. FAO; 2013. [(accessed on 14 May 2013)]. Food Outlook. Available online: http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/ak341e/ak341e09.htm#TopOfPage.
    1. Aerts S., Lips D., Spencer S., Decuypere E., De Tavernier J. A new framework for the assessment of animal welfare: Integrating existing knowledge from a practical ethics perspective. J. Agr. Environ. Ethics. 2006;19:67–76. doi: 10.1007/s10806-005-4376-y. - DOI
    1. McGlone J.J. Farm animal welfare in the context of other society issues: Toward sustainable systems. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2001;72:75–81. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00268-8. - DOI
    1. Webster A. Farm animal welfare: The five freedoms and the free market. Vet. J. 2001;161:229–237. - PubMed
    1. Bracke M., Spruijt B., Metz J., Schouten W. Decision support system for overall welfare assessment in pregnant sows A: Model structure and weighting procedure. J. Anim. Sci. 2002;80:1819–1834. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources