Prevalence and Risk Factors of Self-Reported Smell and Taste Alterations: Results from the 2011-2012 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)
- PMID: 26487703
- PMCID: PMC4715252
- DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjv057
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Self-Reported Smell and Taste Alterations: Results from the 2011-2012 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)
Abstract
Chemosensory problems challenge health through diminished ability to detect warning odors, consume a healthy diet, and maintain quality of life. We examined the prevalence and associated risk factors of self-reported chemosensory alterations in 3603 community-dwelling adults (aged 40+ years), from the nationally representative, US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2012. In this new NHANES component, technicians surveyed adults in the home about perceived smell and taste problems, distortions, and diminished abilities since age 25 (termed "alterations"), and chemosensory-related health risks and behaviors. The prevalence of self-reported smell alteration was 23%, including phantosmia at 6%; taste was 19%, including dysgeusia at 5%. Prevalence rates increased progressively with age, highest in those aged 80+ years (smell, 32%; taste, 27%). In multivariable logistic regression, controlling for sociodemographics, health behaviors, and chemosensory-related conditions, the strongest independent risk factor for smell alteration was sinonasal symptoms (odds ratio [OR] = 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.63-2.61), followed by heavy drinking, loss of consciousness from head injury, family income ≤110% poverty threshold, and xerostomia. For taste, the strongest risk factor was xerostomia (OR = 2.65; 95% CI: 1.97-3.56), followed by nose/facial injury, lower educational attainment, and fair/poor health. Self-reported chemosensory alterations are prevalent in US adults, supporting increased attention to decreasing their modifiable risks, managing safety/health consequences, and expanding chemosensory screening/testing and treatments.
Keywords: dry mouth; dysgeusia; head injury; health status; phantosmia.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures

Similar articles
-
New chemosensory component in the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES): first-year results for measured olfactory dysfunction.Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2016 Jun;17(2):221-40. doi: 10.1007/s11154-016-9364-1. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2016. PMID: 27287364 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Chronic Cigarette Smoking Associates Directly and Indirectly with Self-Reported Olfactory Alterations: Analysis of the 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 May 21;21(6):818-827. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx242. Nicotine Tob Res. 2019. PMID: 29121272 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and risk factors of taste and smell impairment in a nationwide representative sample of the US population: a cross-sectional study.BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 9;6(11):e013246. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013246. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 28157672 Free PMC article.
-
Age-related Smell and Taste Impairments and Vitamin D Associations in the U.S. Adults National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.Nutrients. 2020 Apr 2;12(4):984. doi: 10.3390/nu12040984. Nutrients. 2020. PMID: 32252288 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of aging on oral health and consequences for taste and smell.Physiol Behav. 1999 Apr;66(2):209-15. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(98)00267-4. Physiol Behav. 1999. PMID: 10336146 Review.
Cited by
-
Prognostic value of olfactory evoked potentials in patients with post-infectious olfactory dysfunction.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Oct;278(10):3839-3846. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06683-y. Epub 2021 Mar 1. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021. PMID: 33644842
-
The Epidemiology of Olfactory Disorders.Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2016 May;4(2):130-141. doi: 10.1007/s40136-016-0120-6. Epub 2016 Apr 7. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2016. PMID: 30613439 Free PMC article.
-
Association between subjective olfactory dysfunction and female hormone-related factors in South Korea.Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 27;9(1):20007. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56565-x. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31882785 Free PMC article.
-
Anosmia-A Clinical Review.Chem Senses. 2017 Sep 1;42(7):513-523. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjx025. Chem Senses. 2017. PMID: 28531300 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Olfactory Function and Olfactory Disorders.Laryngorhinootologie. 2023 May;102(S 01):S67-S92. doi: 10.1055/a-1957-3267. Epub 2023 May 2. Laryngorhinootologie. 2023. PMID: 37130532 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Aschenbrenner K, Hummel C, Teszmer K, Krone F, Ishimaru T, Seo HS, Hummel T. 2008. The influence of olfactory loss on dietary behaviors. Laryngoscope. 118(1):135–144. - PubMed
-
- Bartoshuk LM, Catalanotto F, Hoffman H, Logan H, Snyder DJ. 2012. Taste damage (otitis media, tonsillectomy and head and neck cancer), oral sensations and BMI. Physiol Behav. 107(4):516–526. - PubMed
-
- Bergdahl M, Bergdahl J. 2002. Perceived taste disturbance in adults: prevalence and association with oral and psychological factors and medication. Clin Oral Investig. 6(3):145–149. - PubMed
-
- Brämerson A, Johansson L, Ek L, Nordin S, Bende M. 2004. Prevalence of olfactory dysfunction: the skövde population-based study. Laryngoscope. 114(4):733–737. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical