Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct;6(5):469-78.
doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.056.

Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Affiliations

Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Munveer Singh Bhangoo et al. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is aggressive primary malignancy of the liver that most commonly presents late in the disease course. As a result, the majority of patients are not candidates for curative therapies. Locoregional therapies including Yttrium-90 (Y-90) radioembolization play an important role in management of the vast majority of patients with HCC.

Methods: Patients with unnresectable HCC (n=17) treated with Y-90 radioembolization from 2005 to 2014 were evaluated retrospectively. Data was abstracted from medical records including patient charts, laboratory data, and imaging. Toxicities were recorded using Common Terminology Criteria 3.0. Response was recorded according to modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria.

Results: Seventeen patients received 33 treatments with Y-90 radioembolization. A majority (65%) received TheraSphere with a minority (35%) receiving SIR-Spheres. The median treatment activity delivered was 1.725 gBq (range, 1.4-2.5 gBq). The median treatment dose delivered was 100 Gy (range, 90-120 Gy). The median lung shunt fraction was 2.02% (range, 1.5-4.1%). The most common clinical toxicity among all patients was nausea and vomiting (59%), primarily grade 1 and 2. Other post-treatment findings included abdominal pain (29%), fatigue (53%), and weight loss (18%). One patient developed a grade 5 gastric ulcer after the treatment. A clinical benefit, defined as patients achieving complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD), was seen in 48% of patients. PR was seen in 24% of cases; progressive disease (PD) was noted in 35%. Patients survived for a median of 8.4 months (range, 1.3 to 21.1 months) after the first radioembolization treatment. Median survival after Y-90 treatment was 8.4 months among patients treated TheraSphere as compared with 7.8 months in patients treated with SIR-Spheres. The mean overall survival from the time of diagnosis was 11.7 months (range, 3.4 to 43.2 months).

Conclusions: For patients with unresectable HCC, Y-90 radioembolization is a safe and well-tolerated procedure. Our experience suggests that a significant percentage of patients achieve clinical benefit including many with PR. Survival after treatment from this single-center, transplant center is in line with prior reports. Prospective, randomized data is required to compare radioembolization with other therapies including chemoembolization and systemic therapy with sorafenib.

Keywords: SIR-spheres; TheraSphere; Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); Yttrium-90 (Y-90) microspheres; radioembolization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Large 9 cm liver tumor with corresponding hepatic angiogram showing a highly vascular tumor (A) and coiling of a collateral blood vessel (B). CT scan patient 6 and 12 months after Y-90 radioembolization (C,D). This patient was considered to have a partial response, and later developed progression of disease. CT, computed tomography; Y-90, Yttrium-90.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Survival (all patients) in months from time of (A) first Y-90 radio embolization (B) diagnosis. Y-90, Yttrium-90.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:69-90. - PubMed
    1. A new prognostic system for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study of 435 patients: the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) investigators. Hepatology 1998;28:751-5. - PubMed
    1. McDermott WV, Cady B, Georgi B, et al. Primary cancer of the liver. Evaluation, treatment, and prognosis. Arch Surg 1989;124:552-4; discussion 554-5. - PubMed
    1. Johnson PJ. Why can't we cure primary liver cancer? Eur J Cancer 1995;31A:1562-4. - PubMed
    1. Lencioni R, Cioni D, Crocetti L, et al. Early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: long-term results of percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation. Radiology 2005;234:961-7. - PubMed