Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Oct 1;4(10):615-622.
doi: 10.1089/wound.2015.0639.

Adjustability and Adaptability Are Critical Characteristics of Pediatric Support Surfaces

Affiliations
Review

Adjustability and Adaptability Are Critical Characteristics of Pediatric Support Surfaces

Ayelet Levy et al. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). .

Abstract

Significance: Pressure ulcers (PUs) in newborns and children are remarkably different from those in adults, both in their possible causal factors and in the etiology and biomechanical pathways for tissue damage. Recent Advances: Pediatric muscle and fat tissue structures are overall softer than those of adults, making newborns and young children more susceptible to deformation-inflicted injuries at their weight-bearing soft tissues. Critical Issues: The unique medical environment of neonatal and pediatric intensive care units, which is overloaded with medical devices, wiring, tubing, electrodes, and so on, is, in fact, an extrinsic risk factor for device-related PUs, since accidently misplaced tubes, wires, or electrodes can become trapped between the skin and the mattress, causing large sustained soft tissue deformations around them. Future Directions: Mattresses that are being used in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units must be able to respond to frequent movements and changing positions and also be able to effectively adapt and conform around such misplaced tubing or wires, which might contact the body and deform soft tissues. We used computer simulations of a tube caught under a preterm neonate's arm in a supine position to illustrate what adaptability of the support surface means in such cases. Our present simulations indicate that an air-cell-based technology provides considerably better protection against PUs in such cases, as the air-cells are able to locally buckle and conform around objects that are stiffer than the pediatric tissues (e.g., wires, tubes, electrodes), which minimizes exposure to tissue deformations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Amit Gefen, PhD
<b>Figure 1.</b>
Figure 1.
An illustration showing the differences in anatomy, physiology, and tissue biomechanics between adults and infants, in the context of pressure ulcer risks: (a) adult MRI tissue structures in an axial cut through the arm. (b) An increased fat/muscle ratio in an infant's arm compared to that of a scaled-down adult. (c) Increased deformations in muscle and fat tissues, due to reduced tissue stiffness in an infant's arm, compared to those in a scaled-down adult. To see this illustration in color, the reader is referred to the web version of this article at www.liebertpub.com/wound
<b>Figure 2.</b>
Figure 2.
Finite element (FE) computational model of an axial cut through the upper arm of a 1.5 kg preterm neonate, in supine position, when a 2-mm tube is left between the skin and either a flat foam mattress (top panel) or an air-cell-based mattress (bottom panel). Zoom-in on the deformed FE meshes around the tubes is provided in the middle frames. Effective mechanical stress distributions in muscle and fat tissues are on the right. B, bone; M, muscle; F, fat; T, tube. To see this illustration in color, the reader is referred to the web version of this article at www.liebertpub.com/wound

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gefen A. The biomechanics of sitting-acquired pressure ulcers in patients with spinal cord injury or lesions. Int Wound J 2007;4:222–231 - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. In: Haesler Emily, eds. Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Quick Reference Guide. Osborne Park, Western Australia: Cambridge Media, 2014
    1. Coleman S, Gorecki C, Nelson EA, et al. . Patient risk factors for pressure ulcer development: systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 2013;50:974–1003 - PubMed
    1. Baharestani MM, Ratliff CR. Pressure ulcers in neonates and children: an NPUAP white paper. Adv Skin Wound Care 2007;20:208–220 - PubMed
    1. VanGilder C, Macfarlane GD, Meyer S. Results of nine international pressure ulcer prevalence surveys: 1989 to 2005. Ostomy Wound Manage 2008;54:40–54 - PubMed