Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;94(12):1015-25.
doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000404.

Factors Associated with Mobility Outcomes in a National Spina Bifida Patient Registry

Affiliations

Factors Associated with Mobility Outcomes in a National Spina Bifida Patient Registry

Brad E Dicianno et al. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To provide descriptive data on ambulatory ability and muscle strength in a large cohort of individuals with spina bifida enrolled in a National Spina Bifida Patient Registry and to investigate factors associated with ambulatory status.

Design: Cross-sectional analysis of data from a multisite patient registry.

Results: Descriptive analysis of mobility variables for 2604 individuals with spina bifida aged 5 and older are presented from 19 sites in the United States. Analysis of a subset of National Spina Bifida Patient Registry data from 380 individuals from 3 sites accompanied by data from a specialized spina bifida electronic medical record revealed that those with no history of a shunt, lower motor level, and no history of hip or knee contracture release surgery were more likely to be ambulatory at the community level than at the household or wheelchair level.

Conclusion: This study is the first to examine factors associated with ambulatory status in a large sample of individuals with myelomeningocele and nonmyelomeningocele subtypes of spina bifida. Results of this study delineate the breadth of strength and functional abilities within the different age groups and subtypes of spina bifida. The results may inform physicians of the characteristics of those with varying ambulatory abilities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Phase I NSBPR variables
Figure 2
Figure 2
Phase II Additional EMR Variables
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 3a. Number of Phase I participants with myelomeningocele subtype (y axis) sorted by ambulatory status and motor level Figure 3b. Number of Phase I participants with non-myelomeningocele subtypes (y axis) sorted by ambulatory status and motor level
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 4a. Number of Phase I participants with myelomeningocele subtype (y axis) sorted by ambulatory status and age category Figure 4b. Number of Phase I participants with non-myelomeningocele subtypes (y axis) sorted by ambulatory status and age category

References

    1. Spina Bifida Association. [Accessed February 5, 2015]; http://www.spinabifidaassociation.org/site/c.knKLINNkEiG/b.5712305/k.301....
    1. Dicianno BE, Kurowski BG, Yang JM, et al. Rehabilitation and medical management of the adult with spina bifida. American Journal of Physical Medicine & rRehabilitation/Association of Academic Physiatrists. 2008;87(12):1027–1050. - PubMed
    1. Dicianno BE, Gaines A, Collins DM, Lee S. Mobility, assistive technology use, and social integration among adults with spina bifida. AmericanJournal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation/Association of Academic Physiatrists. 2009;88(7):533–541. - PubMed
    1. Schoenmakers MA, Gulmans VA, Gooskens RH, Helders PJ. Spina bifida at the sacral level: More than minor gait disturbances. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(2):178–185. - PubMed
    1. Verhoef M, Barf HA, Post MW, van Asbeck FW, Gooskens RH, Prevo AJ. Secondary impairments in young adults with spina bifida. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 2004;46(6):420–427. - PubMed

MeSH terms