Obstetric anal sphincter injury rates among primiparous women with different modes of vaginal delivery
- PMID: 26489488
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.025
Obstetric anal sphincter injury rates among primiparous women with different modes of vaginal delivery
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether rates of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) are continuing to increase and whether risk of OASIS according to mode of delivery is constant over time.
Methods: In a retrospective population-based study, data were obtained for vaginal singleton vertex deliveries at 37-41 weeks of pregnancy among primiparous women in New South Wales, Australia, between January 2001 and December 2011. Annual OASIS rates were determined among non-instrumental, forceps, and vacuum deliveries with and without episiotomy. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine adjusted odds ratios for each delivery mode category by year. Trends in adjusted odds ratios over time for each delivery category were compared.
Results: OASIS occurred in 955 (4.1%) of 23 081 deliveries in 2001 and 1487 (5.9%) of 25 081 deliveries in 2011. After adjustment for known risk factors, the only delivery categories to show statistically significant increases in OASIS over the study period were non-instrumental deliveries without episiotomy (linear trend P<0.001) and forceps deliveries with episiotomy (linear trend P=0.004).
Conclusion: Overall, OASIS rates have continued to increase. Known risk factors do not fully explain the increase in OASIS rates in non-instrumental deliveries without an episiotomy and in forceps deliveries with an episiotomy.
Keywords: Forceps; International Classification of Diseases; Obstetric anal sphincter injury; Record linkage study; Vacuum.
Crown Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries during instrumental vaginal delivery: An observational study based on 18-years of real-world data.BJOG. 2024 Dec;131(13):1824-1831. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17914. Epub 2024 Jul 18. BJOG. 2024. PMID: 39030798
-
The effectiveness of mediolateral episiotomy in preventing obstetric anal sphincter injuries during operative vaginal delivery: a ten-year analysis of a national registry.Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar;29(3):407-413. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3422-4. Epub 2017 Jul 18. Int Urogynecol J. 2018. PMID: 28721483
-
Modifiable risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: a population-based cohort study.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;210(1):59.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.043. Epub 2013 Aug 30. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 23999415
-
Episiotomy in vacuum-assisted delivery affects the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Dec;207:193-199. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.013. Epub 2016 Oct 26. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016. PMID: 27865945
-
[Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in vaginal births could be reduced].Duodecim. 2012;128(19):1981-7. Duodecim. 2012. PMID: 23155749 Review. Finnish.
Cited by
-
How to do it: delayed sphincteroplasty for obstetric anal sphincter injury.ANZ J Surg. 2022 May;92(5):1208-1210. doi: 10.1111/ans.17650. Epub 2022 Mar 25. ANZ J Surg. 2022. PMID: 35332987 Free PMC article.
-
Level of episiotomy practice and its disparity among primiparous and multiparous women in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Nov 6;4:1153640. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1153640. eCollection 2023. Front Glob Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 38025985 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A multi-centre quality improvement project to reduce the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): study protocol.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Aug 13;18(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1965-0. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018. PMID: 30103734 Free PMC article.
-
Berlin survey on obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI).Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Oct;306(4):1117-1125. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06627-9. Epub 2022 Jun 4. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022. PMID: 35665847
-
A novel classification for evaluating episiotomy practices: application to the Burgundy perinatal network.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Aug 16;19(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2424-2. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019. PMID: 31419953 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical