[Conization and radical vaginal trachelectomy with laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in fertility-sparing surgical treatment of cervical cancer]
- PMID: 26492707
- DOI: 10.17772/gp/58986
[Conization and radical vaginal trachelectomy with laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in fertility-sparing surgical treatment of cervical cancer]
Abstract
Introduction: In the mid-80's and 90's of the last century uterine-sparing surgical treatment methods were proposed to women wishing to preserve their fertility.
Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess practical application of conization or radical vaginal trachelectomy with laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in women with squamous cell cervical cancer (FIGO stages IA and IB1) who want to retain their ability to procreate. Material and methods: A total of 119 women (aged 25-43 years) were included in the study Ninety-six women (60 - IA1 and 36 - IA2) were deemed eligible for conization and 23 women with stages IA2 and IB1 with neoplastic changes of <2cm in diameter were qualified for radical vaginal trachelectomy with laparoscopic lymphadenectomy
Results: Conization was not radical in 9 cases and these women were reoperated. A 5-year follow-up in patients after conization revealed disease recurrence (CIN) in 3 IA1 cases (6.5%), and 2 IA2 cases (9.1%). In patients with follow-up of <5 years, no recurrence was observed in 9 out of 10 A1 cases. Similarly there was no recurrence in 7 out of 9 lA2 cases. A 5-year follow-up in patients after trachelectomy confirmed disease recurrence (CIN) in 1 IA2 case (6.25%). There was no disease recurrence in 2 IA1 cases and 4 IB1 cases. Out of 8 subjects staged 1A2 with a follow-up of <5 years, no disease recurrence was observed in 7 (87.5%) patients. During the same follow-up time, no disease recurrence was detected in 3 patients staged IB1.
Conclusions: Proper uterine-sparing treatment with appropriate qualification guarantees adequate control of the treatment process in women with cervical cancer stages IA and IB1 (<2 cm in diameter) according to FIGO.
Similar articles
-
[Pregnancy and labor after fertility-sparing surgical management of cervical cancer].Ginekol Pol. 2015 Sep;86(9):700-5. Ginekol Pol. 2015. PMID: 26665573 Polish.
-
Type B Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy With Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Early Cervical Cancer.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jan 1;24(1):14-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 11. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 27298263
-
Nerve-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy versus nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in early-stage (FIGO IA2-IB) cervical cancer: a comparative study on feasibility and outcome.Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 May;24(4):735-43. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000114. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24651626
-
Patient-tailored conservative surgical treatment of invasive uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma. A review.Minerva Ginecol. 2013 Aug;65(4):407-15. Minerva Ginecol. 2013. PMID: 24051940 Review.
-
Simple conization and pelvic lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis and review of the literature.Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Aug;158(2):231-235. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.035. Epub 2020 Jun 6. Gynecol Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32518013 Review.
Cited by
-
Variation in outcome reporting in studies of fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer: A systematic review.BJOG. 2023 Jan;130(2):163-175. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17342. BJOG. 2023. PMID: 36367451 Free PMC article.