Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2016 Jan;57(1):46-53.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.163782. Epub 2015 Oct 22.

Comparison of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Based 18F-DCFBC PET/CT to Conventional Imaging Modalities for Detection of Hormone-Naïve and Castration-Resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Comparison of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Based 18F-DCFBC PET/CT to Conventional Imaging Modalities for Detection of Hormone-Naïve and Castration-Resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Steven P Rowe et al. J Nucl Med. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

Conventional imaging modalities (CIMs) have limited sensitivity and specificity for detection of metastatic prostate cancer. We examined the potential of a first-in-class radiofluorinated small-molecule inhibitor of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), N-[N-[(S)-1,3-dicarboxypropyl]carbamoyl]-4-(18)F-fluorobenzyl-l-cysteine ((18)F-DCFBC), to detect metastatic hormone-naïve (HNPC) and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

Methods: Seventeen patients were prospectively enrolled (9 HNPC and 8 CRPC); 16 had CIM evidence of new or progressive metastatic prostate cancer and 1 had high clinical suspicion of metastatic disease. (18)F-DCFBC PET/CT imaging was obtained with 2 successive PET scans starting at 2 h after injection. Patients were imaged with CIM at approximately the time of PET. A lesion-by-lesion analysis of PET to CIM was performed in the context of either HNPC or CRPC. The patients were followed with available clinical imaging as a reference standard to determine the true nature of identified lesions on PET and CIM.

Results: On the lesion-by-lesion analysis, (18)F-DCFBC PET was able to detect a larger number of lesions (592 positive with 63 equivocal) than CIM (520 positive with 61 equivocal) overall, in both HNPC and CRPC patients. (18)F-DCFBC PET detection of lymph nodes, bone lesions, and visceral lesions was superior to CIM. When intrapatient clustering effects were considered, (18)F-DCFBC PET was estimated to be positive in a large proportion of lesions that would be negative or equivocal on CIM (0.45). On follow-up, the sensitivity of (18)F-DCFBC PET (0.92) was superior to CIM (0.71). (18)F-DCFBC tumor uptake was increased at the later PET time point (~2.5 h after injection), with background uptake showing a decreasing trend on later PET.

Conclusion: PET imaging with (18)F-DCFBC, a small-molecule PSMA-targeted radiotracer, detected more lesions than CIM and promises to diagnose and stage patients with metastatic prostate cancer more accurately than current imaging methods.

Keywords: bone scan; computed tomography; metastatic prostate cancer; positron emission tomography; prostate-specific membrane antigen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Chemical structure of 18F-DCBFC, first-in-class radiofluorinated inhibitor of PSMA.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box plot of SUVmax for 18F-DCFBC PET–positive metastatic lesions by location and patient's androgen-resistant status (A) and box plot of average SUV for various regions of background physiologic uptake (B).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Anterior projection planar BS (A), 18F-DCFBC PET maximum-intensity projection (B), axial CT (C), and axial 18F-DCFBC PET/CT fusion (D) images from patient thought to have degenerative arthritic changes at site of 99mTc-MDP uptake on bone scan (black arrowhead in A). However, intense focal 18F-DCFBC uptake was also noted at this site that progressed on follow-up corresponding to rise in prostate-specific antigen (black and white arrowheads in B–D).
Figure 4
Figure 4
18F-DCFBC PET maximum-intensity projection (A), axial CECT (B), and axial fused 18F-DCFBC PET/CT (C) images from patient with a subtle lytic bone lesion on CT that corresponded to intense 18F-DCFBC uptake in right posterolateral T5 vertebral body and progressed on follow-up as patient's prostate-specific antigen level continued to rise (black and white arrowheads in A–C).
Figure 5
Figure 5
18F-DCFBC PET maximum-intensity projection (A), axial CECT (B), and axial fused 18F-DCFBC PET/CT (C) images demonstrating intense 18F-DCFBC uptake in multiple small pelvic lymph nodes that had been deemed too small to be definitively disease-involved on CECT (black and white arrowheads in A–C). Lymph nodes decreased in size on follow-up imaging and correlated with fall in patient's prostate-specific antigen level to undetectable.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Posterior projection planar BS (A), 18F-DCFBC PET maximum-intensity projection (posterior view, B), axial CT (C), axial 18F-DCFBC PET (D), and axial fused 18F-DCFBC PET/CT (E) images from patient who was postprostatectomy with rising prostate-specific antigen and was naïve to systemic androgen-deprivation therapy and chemotherapy. Imaging demonstrates intense 99mTc-MDP uptake on BS and corresponding dense sclerosis on CT of right scapula without significant 18F-DCFBC uptake (black and white arrowheads in A–E). This lesion progressed in extent to involve more of scapula on follow-up imaging in correlation with rising prostate-specific antigen level in this patient.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:9–29. - PubMed
    1. Bauman G, Belhocine T, Kovacs M, Ward A, Beheshti M, Rachinsky I. 18F-fluorocholine for prostate cancer imaging: a systematic review of the literature. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2012;15:45–55. - PubMed
    1. Beheshti M, Treglia G, Zakavi SR, et al. Application of 11C-acetate positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging in prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. BJU Int. 2013;2013:13. - PubMed
    1. Evangelista L, Guttilla A, Zattoni F, Muzzio PC. Utility of choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography for lymph node involvement identification in intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2013;63:1040–1048. - PubMed
    1. Evangelista L, Zattoni F, Guttilla A, Saladini G, Colletti PM, Rubello D. Choline PET or PET/CT and biochemical relapse of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38:305–314. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances