Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2015;88(1056):20150555.
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150555. Epub 2015 Oct 23.

Multicentre analysis of incidental findings on low-resolution CT attenuation correction images: an extended study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Multicentre analysis of incidental findings on low-resolution CT attenuation correction images: an extended study

Joanne Coward et al. Br J Radiol. 2015.

Abstract

Objective: To review new incidental findings detected on low-resolution CT attenuation correction (CTAC) images acquired during single-photon emission CT-CT myocardial perfusion imaging as an extension to our initial study.

Methods: CTAC images acquired as part of myocardial perfusion imaging performed using single-photon emission CT at four UK nuclear medicine centres were evaluated as part of a multicentre study. New incidental findings that were considered to be clinically significant were evaluated further. Positive-predictive value (PPV) was determined at the time of definitive diagnosis.

Results: Out of 3485 patients, 962 (28%) patients had a positive finding on the CTAC image, of which 824 (24%) were new findings. 84 (2.4%) patients had findings that were considered clinically significant at the time of the CTAC report and which had not been previously diagnosed. However, only 10 (0.29%) of these had findings that were confirmed as clinically significant, with the potential to be detrimental to patient outcome, after follow-up and definitive diagnosis.

Conclusion: The overall PPV from all centres over the 2-year period was 12%. Each centre achieved what we considered to be low PPVs with no significant difference between the present and initial studies. The additional data from the combined studies show that, statistically, there is no significant difference between the PPVs from any of the centres. We conclude that routine reporting of CTAC images is not beneficial.

Advances in knowledge: This study combined with the previous study offers a unique evaluation of new clinically significant incidental findings on low-resolution CT images in an attempt to determine the benefit of reporting the CTAC images.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A breast lesion that appeared solid on CT but was a benign cyst.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Clinical and radiological diagnoses of progressing lung cancer.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sharma P, Patel CD, Karunanithi S, Maharjan S, Malhotra A. Comparative accuracy of CT attenuation-corrected and non-attenuation-corrected SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Clin Nucl Med 2012; 37: 332–8. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e31823ea16b - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pazhenkottil AP, Ghadri JR, Nkoulou RN, Wolfrum M, Buechel RR, Kuest SM, et al. . Improved outcome prediction by SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging after CT attenuation correction. J Nucl Med 2011; 52: 196–200. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.080580 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Budoff MJ, Fischer H, Gopal A. Incidental findings with cardiac CT evaluation: should we read beyond the heart? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 68: 965–73. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20924 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coward J, Lawson R, Kane T, Elias M, Howes A, Birchall J, et al. . Multi-centre analysis of incidental findings on low-resolution CT attenuation correction images. Br J Radiol 2014; 87: 20130701. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130701 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Standards for the reporting and interpretation of imaging investigations. London, UK: Royal College of Radiologists; 2006.

Publication types

MeSH terms