Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Mar;60(2):184-204.
doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mev076. Epub 2015 Oct 21.

A Source-based Measurement Database for Occupational Exposure Assessment of Electromagnetic Fields in the INTEROCC Study: A Literature Review Approach

Collaborators, Affiliations
Review

A Source-based Measurement Database for Occupational Exposure Assessment of Electromagnetic Fields in the INTEROCC Study: A Literature Review Approach

Javier Vila et al. Ann Occup Hyg. 2016 Mar.

Erratum in

Abstract

Introduction: To date, occupational exposure assessment of electromagnetic fields (EMF) has relied on occupation-based measurements and exposure estimates. However, misclassification due to between-worker variability remains an unsolved challenge. A source-based approach, supported by detailed subject data on determinants of exposure, may allow for a more individualized exposure assessment. Detailed information on the use of occupational sources of exposure to EMF was collected as part of the INTERPHONE-INTEROCC study. To support a source-based exposure assessment effort within this study, this work aimed to construct a measurement database for the occupational sources of EMF exposure identified, assembling available measurements from the scientific literature.

Methods: First, a comprehensive literature search was performed for published and unpublished documents containing exposure measurements for the EMF sources identified, a priori as well as from answers of study subjects. Then, the measurements identified were assessed for quality and relevance to the study objectives. Finally, the measurements selected and complementary information were compiled into an Occupational Exposure Measurement Database (OEMD).

Results: Currently, the OEMD contains 1624 sets of measurements (>3000 entries) for 285 sources of EMF exposure, organized by frequency band (0 Hz to 300 GHz) and dosimetry type. Ninety-five documents were selected from the literature (almost 35% of them are unpublished technical reports), containing measurements which were considered informative and valid for our purpose. Measurement data and complementary information collected from these documents came from 16 different countries and cover the time period between 1974 and 2013.

Conclusion: We have constructed a database with measurements and complementary information for the most common sources of exposure to EMF in the workplace, based on the responses to the INTERPHONE-INTEROCC study questionnaire. This database covers the entire EMF frequency range and represents the most comprehensive resource of information on occupational EMF exposure. It is available at www.crealradiation.com/index.php/en/databases.

Keywords: EMF sources; electromagnetic fields; exposure database; literature review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of source-based occupational exposure assessment to EMF in INTEROCC. This flowchart outlines the different steps of the exposure assessment approach developed within the INTEROCC project. The current manuscript entails steps 1 through 4 which led to the development of the EMF Occupational Exposure Measurement Database (OEMD). Steps 5 and 6 will be described and published elsewhere.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Description of the literature review performed to construct the OEMD. This flowchart describes the different steps and number of documents identified, included and excluded throughout the literature review carried out to construct the OEMD. (a) This figure includes some books, book chapters or actual measurements (n = 5). (b) This figure includes both published (n = 59) and unpublished articles (n = 3). (c) This rating refers to the full document or sets of measurements within the document. As stated in the text, documents with a rating <1 were included in the database if they made a unique contribution to the exposure assessment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
B-field versus distance for ELF (50/60 Hz) sources (A) and E-field versus distance for RF sources (continuous shortwave diathermy, 27.12 MHz and roof-top paging antenna, 678.4 MHz) (B). The EMF magnitudes available in the OEMD were fit by regression techniques to functions of the inverse distance = constant × d−n.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdollahzadeh S, Hammond SK, Schenker MB. (1995)A model for assessing occupational exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields in fabrication rooms in the Semiconductor Health Study. Am J Ind Med; 28: 723–34. - PubMed
    1. Allen SG. (1991)Radiofrequency field measurements and hazard assessment. J Radiol Prot; 11: 49–62.
    1. Allen SG, Blackwell RP, Chadwick PJ, et al. (1994)Review of occupational exposure to optical radiation and electric and magnetic fields with regard to the proposed CEC physical agents directive. Chilton, Oxon, UK: National Radiological Protection Board. ISBN: 0859513688.
    1. Andreuccetti D, Bini M, Ignesti A, et al. (1988)Analysis of electric and magnetic fields leaking from induction heaters. Bioelectromagnetics; 9: 373–9. - PubMed
    1. Auger CP. (1998)Information sources in grey literature (guides to information sources). London; New Providence, NJ: Bowker-Saur. ISBN: 1857391942.

Publication types