Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct 22:4:138.
doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0125-0.

Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada

Affiliations

Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada

Katelyn Godin et al. Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Grey literature is an important source of information for large-scale review syntheses. However, there are many characteristics of grey literature that make it difficult to search systematically. Further, there is no 'gold standard' for rigorous systematic grey literature search methods and few resources on how to conduct this type of search. This paper describes systematic review search methods that were developed and applied to complete a case study systematic review of grey literature that examined guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada.

Methods: A grey literature search plan was developed to incorporate four different searching strategies: (1) grey literature databases, (2) customized Google search engines, (3) targeted websites, and (4) consultation with contact experts. These complementary strategies were used to minimize the risk of omitting relevant sources. Since abstracts are often unavailable in grey literature documents, items' abstracts, executive summaries, or table of contents (whichever was available) were screened. Screening of publications' full-text followed. Data were extracted on the organization, year published, who they were developed by, intended audience, goal/objectives of document, sources of evidence/resources cited, meals mentioned in the guidelines, and recommendations for program delivery.

Results: The search strategies for identifying and screening publications for inclusion in the case study review was found to be manageable, comprehensive, and intuitive when applied in practice. The four search strategies of the grey literature search plan yielded 302 potentially relevant items for screening. Following the screening process, 15 publications that met all eligibility criteria remained and were included in the case study systematic review. The high-level findings of the case study systematic review are briefly described.

Conclusions: This article demonstrated a feasible and seemingly robust method for applying systematic search strategies to identify web-based resources in the grey literature. The search strategy we developed and tested is amenable to adaptation to identify other types of grey literature from other disciplines and answering a wide range of research questions. This method should be further adapted and tested in future research syntheses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow diagram. This figure depicts the three phases of the review, including the number of records screened and included in the final synthesis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Search plan timeline. This figure demonstrates the timeline and number of hours spent during each stage of the study plan

References

    1. Farace DJ, Frantzen J, editors. Sixth international conference on grey literature: work on grey in progress. grey literature 2004 conference proceedings; Dec. 6–7, 2004. Amsterdam: TextRelease; 2005.
    1. Higgins J, Green S editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 5.1.0 ed. Chichester, United Kingdom: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
    1. Benzies KM, Premji S, Hayden KA, Serrett K. State‐of‐the‐evidence reviews: advantages and challenges of including grey literature. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2006;3(2):55–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2006.00051.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morton S, Levit L, Berg A, Eden J. Finding what works in health care: standards for systematic reviews. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2011. - PubMed
    1. Hopewell S, McDonald S, Clarke M, Egger M. Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2:2. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources