Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;33(2):384-93.
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv225. Epub 2015 Oct 22.

Strong Constraint on Human Genes Escaping X-Inactivation Is Modulated by their Expression Level and Breadth in Both Sexes

Affiliations

Strong Constraint on Human Genes Escaping X-Inactivation Is Modulated by their Expression Level and Breadth in Both Sexes

Andrea Slavney et al. Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

In eutherian mammals, X-linked gene expression is normalized between XX females and XY males through the process of X chromosome inactivation (XCI). XCI results in silencing of transcription from one ChrX homolog per female cell. However, approximately 25% of human ChrX genes escape XCI to some extent and exhibit biallelic expression in females. The evolutionary basis of this phenomenon is not entirely clear, but high sequence conservation of XCI escapers suggests that purifying selection may directly or indirectly drive XCI escape at these loci. One hypothesis is that this signal results from contributions to developmental and physiological sex differences, but presently there is limited evidence supporting this model in humans. Another potential driver of this signal is selection for high and/or broad gene expression in both sexes, which are strong predictors of reduced nucleotide substitution rates in mammalian genes. Here, we compared purifying selection and gene expression patterns of human XCI escapers with those of X-inactivated genes in both sexes. When we accounted for the functional status of each ChrX gene's Y-linked homolog (or "gametolog"), we observed that XCI escapers exhibit greater degrees of purifying selection in the human lineage than X-inactivated genes, as well as higher and broader gene expression than X-inactivated genes across tissues in both sexes. These results highlight a significant role for gene expression in both sexes in driving purifying selection on XCI escapers, and emphasize these genes' potential importance in human disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

F<sc>ig</sc>. 1.
Fig. 1.
XCI escapers show larger fractions of sites under strong purifying selection (S) and smaller fractions of neutral sites (N) than X-inactivated genes with the same Y gametolog status. XCI escaper-to-X-inactivated ratios of the values of N and S are presented, with standard deviations based on 1,000 bootstrap samples of genes in each XCI/Y category (error bars denote ±1 standard deviation). The numbers (n) of XCI escaper and X-inactivated genes in each Y gametolog category are shown below the category names at the top of the plot. The whole ChrX category includes genes from all other categories, as well as 18 genes that did not have a Y gametolog status assignment (12 XCI escapers and 6 X-inactivated genes). The no Y category is the union of the pseudogenized and lost Y categories.
F<sc>ig</sc>. 2.
Fig. 2.
(a) XCI category average gene expression by Y gametolog status, tissue, and sex. Scatterplots show the XCI/Y category averages of gene expression values for each sex in each GTEx tissue. Shaded areas show the standard deviation of the average across genes. In both plots, individual expression values were filtered by tissue-specific cutoffs (see Methods) before being incorporated into gene averages. (b) Global mean expression for each gene by XCI status, Y gametolog status, and sex. Each point in these one-dimensional scatterplots shows the global mean expression value of a single gene in female (left) and male (right) samples. The white diamonds indicate the mean expression value of the genes in that XCI/Y category. Areas of darker color indicate overlap of two or more points. In both plots, individual expression values were filtered by tissue-specific cutoffs (see Methods) before being incorporated into gene averages.
F<sc>ig</sc>. 3.
Fig. 3.
XCI escapers are more broadly expressed than X-inactivated genes with the same Y gametolog status in both sexes: Points show τ statistic values for all genes in each XCI/Y category for female (left) and male (right) samples. White diamonds show the mean of τ across all genes in that XCI/Y category. Areas of darker color indicate overlap of two or more points. Values of τ range from 0 to 1, with higher values corresponding to greater tissue specificity.

Similar articles

  • Strong purifying selection at genes escaping X chromosome inactivation.
    Park C, Carrel L, Makova KD. Park C, et al. Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Nov;27(11):2446-50. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq143. Epub 2010 Jun 9. Mol Biol Evol. 2010. PMID: 20534706 Free PMC article.
  • Cross-species examination of X-chromosome inactivation highlights domains of escape from silencing.
    Balaton BP, Fornes O, Wasserman WW, Brown CJ. Balaton BP, et al. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2021 Feb 17;14(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13072-021-00386-8. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2021. PMID: 33597016 Free PMC article.
  • Landscape of X chromosome inactivation across human tissues.
    Tukiainen T, Villani AC, Yen A, Rivas MA, Marshall JL, Satija R, Aguirre M, Gauthier L, Fleharty M, Kirby A, Cummings BB, Castel SE, Karczewski KJ, Aguet F, Byrnes A; GTEx Consortium; Laboratory, Data Analysis &Coordinating Center (LDACC)—Analysis Working Group; Statistical Methods groups—Analysis Working Group; Enhancing GTEx (eGTEx) groups; NIH Common Fund; NIH/NCI; NIH/NHGRI; NIH/NIMH; NIH/NIDA; Biospecimen Collection Source Site—NDRI; Biospecimen Collection Source Site—RPCI; Biospecimen Core Resource—VARI; Brain Bank Repository—University of Miami Brain Endowment Bank; Leidos Biomedical—Project Management; ELSI Study; Genome Browser Data Integration &Visualization—EBI; Genome Browser Data Integration &Visualization—UCSC Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz; Lappalainen T, Regev A, Ardlie KG, Hacohen N, MacArthur DG. Tukiainen T, et al. Nature. 2017 Oct 11;550(7675):244-248. doi: 10.1038/nature24265. Nature. 2017. PMID: 29022598 Free PMC article.
  • Genes that escape from X-chromosome inactivation: Potential contributors to Klinefelter syndrome.
    Navarro-Cobos MJ, Balaton BP, Brown CJ. Navarro-Cobos MJ, et al. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2020 Jun;184(2):226-238. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31800. Epub 2020 May 22. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2020. PMID: 32441398 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Escape From X-Chromosome Inactivation: An Evolutionary Perspective.
    Posynick BJ, Brown CJ. Posynick BJ, et al. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019 Oct 22;7:241. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00241. eCollection 2019. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019. PMID: 31696116 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Bellott DW, Hughes JF, Skaletsky H, Brown LG, Pyntikova T, Cho TJ, Koutseva N, Zaghlul S, Graves T, Rock S, et al. 2014. Mammalian Y chromosomes retain widely expressed dosage sensitive regulators. Nature 508:494–499. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berletch JB, Yang F, Xu J, Carrel L, Disteche CM. 2011. Genes that escape from X inactivation. Hum Genet. 130:237–245. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bione S, Sala C, Manzini C, Arrigo G, Zuffardi O, Banfi S, Borsani G, Jonveaux P, Philippe C, Zuccotti M, et al. 1998. A human homologue of the Drosophila melanogaster diaphanous gene is disrupted in a patient with premature ovarian failure: evidence for conserved function in oogenesis and implications for human sterility. Am J Hum Genet. 62:533–541. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown CJ, Greally JM. 2003. A stain upon the silence: genes escaping X inactivation. Trends Genet. 19:432–438. - PubMed
    1. Carrel L, Willard HF. 2005. X-inactivation profile reveals extensive variability in X-linked gene expression in females. Nature 434:400–404. - PubMed

Publication types