Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct;68(5):469-75.
doi: 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.5.469. Epub 2015 Sep 30.

Spinal versus general anesthesia for Cesarean section in patients with sickle cell anemia

Affiliations

Spinal versus general anesthesia for Cesarean section in patients with sickle cell anemia

Mohamed H Bakri et al. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Sickle cell anemia (SCA) increases the rate of maternal and fetal complications. This pilot study was designed to compare the maternal and fetal outcomes of spinal versus general anesthesia (GA) for parturients with SCA undergoing cesarean delivery.

Methods: Forty parturients with known SCA scheduled for elective Cesarean delivery were randomized into spinal anesthesia (n = 20) and GA groups (n = 20). Perioperative hemodynamic parameters were recorded. Postpartum complications were followed up. Opioid consumption was calculated. Blood loss during surgery and the number of patients who received intraoperative or postpartum blood transfusion were recorded. Patient satisfaction with the type of anesthesia was assessed. The Apgar score at 1 and 5 min, neonatal admission to the intensive care unit, and mortality were also recorded.

Results: Blood loss was significantly higher in the GA than spinal group (P = 0.01). However, the number of patients who received an intraoperative or postpartum blood transfusion was statistically insignificant. Significantly more patients developed intraoperative hypotension and bradycardia in the spinal than GA group. Opioid use during the first 24 h was significantly higher in the GA than spinal group (P < 0.0001). More patients had vaso-occlusive crisis in the GA than spinal group without statistical significance (P = 0.4). There was one case of acute chest syndrome in the GA group. No significant differences were observed in postoperative nausea and/or vomiting, patient satisfaction, or hospital length of stay. Neonatal Apgar scores were significantly better in the spinal than GA group at 1 and 5 min (P = 0.006 and P = 0.009, respectively). Neonatal intensive care admission was not significantly different between the two groups, and there was no neonatal mortality.

Conclusions: Spinal anesthesia may have advantages over GA in parturients with SCA undergoing Cesarean delivery.

Keywords: Apgar score; Cesarean section; General anesthesia; Sickle cell anemia; Spinal anesthesia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Comparison of mean arterial blood pressure between the two groups.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Comparison of heart rate between the two groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Silva-Pinto AC, de Oliveira Domingues Ladeira S, Brunetta DM, De Santis GC, de Lucena Angulo I, Covas DT. Sickle cell disease and pregnancy: analysis of 34 patients followed at the Regional Blood Center of Ribeirão Preto, Brazil. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2014;36:329–333. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Koshy M, Burd L. Management of pregnancy in sickle cell syndromes. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1991;5:585–596. - PubMed
    1. Camous J, N'da A, Etienne-Julan M, Stéphan F. Anesthetic management of pregnant women with sickle cell disease-effect on postnatal sickling complications. Can J Anaesth. 2008;55:276–283. - PubMed
    1. Brousse V, Makani J, Rees DC. Management of sickle cell disease in the community. BMJ. 2014;348:g1765. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Black AS, Newcombe GN, Plummer JL, McLeod DH, Martin DK. Spinal anaesthesia for ambulatory arthroscopic surgery of the knee: a comparison of low-dose prilocaine and fentanyl with bupivacaine and fentanyl. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106:183–188. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources