Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep 4;3(9):e507.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000484. eCollection 2015 Sep.

Trends in Immediate Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction in the United Kingdom

Daniel R Leff  1 , Alex Bottle  1 , Erik Mayer  1 , Darren K Patten  1 , Christopher Rao  1 , Paul Aylin  1 , Dimitri J Hadjiminas  1 , Thanos Athanasiou  1 , Ara Darzi  1 , Gerald Gui  1
Affiliations

Trends in Immediate Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction in the United Kingdom

Daniel R Leff et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. .

Abstract

Background: The study aimed to evaluate local and national trends in immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) using the national English administrative records, Hospital Episode Statistics. Our prediction was an increase in implant-only and free flap procedures and a decline in latissimus flap reconstructions.

Methods: Data from an oncoplastic center were interrogated to derive numbers of implant-only, autologous latissimus dorsi (LD), LD-assisted, and autologous pedicled or free flap IBR procedures performed between 2004 and 2013. Similarly, Hospital Episode Statistics data were used to quantify national trends in these procedures from 1996 to 2012 using a curve fitting analysis.

Results: National data suggest an increase in LD procedures between 1996 (n = 250) and 2002 (n = 958), a gradual rise until 2008 (n = 1398) followed by a decline until 2012 (n = 1090). As a percentage of total IBR, trends in LD flap reconstruction better fit a quadratic (R(2) = 0.97) than a linear function (R(2) = 0.63), confirming a proportional recent decline in LD flap procedures. Conversely, autologous (non-LD) flap reconstructions have increased (1996 = 0.44%; 2012 = 2.76%), whereas implant-only reconstructions have declined (1996 = 95.42%; 2012 = 84.92%). Locally, 70 implant-assisted LD procedures were performed in 2003 -2004, but only 2 were performed in 2012 to 2013.

Conclusions: Implants are the most common IBR technique; autologous free flap procedures have increased, and pedicled LD flap procedures are in decline.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article. The Article Processing Charge was paid for by the Imperial College London and the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Longitudinal variation in subcategories of immediate breast reconstruction performed at the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust 2004–2013. Data episodes arranged sequentially according to financial year(s), such that 2004 data = number of reconstructive procedures performed from April 5, 2003, to April 5, 2004; 2005 data = April 5, 2004, to April 5, 2005, etc. LD Expander indicates latissimus dorsi plus expander/implant.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Longitudinal trends in National LD flap immediate breast reconstruction rates for financial years 1996–2012. A, Charts highlight trends in LD-expander rates. B, Proportion of LD flap procedures expressed as a percentage of the total postmastectomy breast reconstruction load. Lines of “best-fit” for linear and quadratic functions are superimposed.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Trends in the crude numbers of implant-assisted LD flap reconstructions across 4 UK NHS Trusts, 1996–2012. The plots for NHS Trusts reflect a similar trend to that observed at the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (2003–2012): RP5 Doncaster and Basseltow NHS Trust (A); RNZ Salisbury NHS Trust (B); RVJ North Bristol NHS Trust (C); and RYQ South London Healthcare NHS Trust (D).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Longitudinal trends in proportions (% of total IBR) of each subtype of breast reconstruction performed in United Kingdom and United States. Charts depict proportional decrease in LD- and implant-based reconstruction and increase in autologous free flap reconstruction (A), and the opposing trend observed in an insured population in the United States (C). Conversely, the reduction in LD flap reconstruction and increase in DIEP or free flap microsurgery observed at the RMH (B) is mirrored in certain academic institutes in the United States (D). Autog indicates autologous; autog+, autologous plus implant. Procedural schematic illustrations reproduced with permission from http://www.breastreconstruction.org.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Zhong T, McCarthy C, Min S, et al. Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life after autologous tissue breast reconstruction: a prospective analysis of early postoperative outcomes. Cancer. 2012;118:1701–1709. - PubMed
    1. Health and Social Care Information Centre. National Mastectomy and Reconstruction Audit. 2011. Available at: http://www.hscic.gov.uk/. Accessed May 13, 2015.
    1. Lang JE, Summers DE, Cui H, et al. Trends in post-mastectomy reconstruction: a SEER database analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2013;108:163–168. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clough KB, Louis-Sylvestre C, Fitoussi A, et al. Donor site sequelae after autologous breast reconstruction with an extended latissimus dorsi flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:1904–1911. - PubMed
    1. Menke H, Erkens M, Olbrisch RR. Evolving concepts in breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flaps: results and follow-up of 121 consecutive patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2001;47:107–114. - PubMed