CREDIBILITY, PEER REVIEW, AND NATURE, 1945-1990
- PMID: 26495581
- PMCID: PMC4528400
- DOI: 10.1098/rsnr.2015.0029
CREDIBILITY, PEER REVIEW, AND NATURE, 1945-1990
Abstract
This paper examines the refereeing procedures at the scientific weekly Nature during and after World War II. In 1939 former editorial assistants L. J. F. Brimble and A. J. V. Gale assumed a joint editorship of Nature. The Brimble-Gale era is now most famous for the editors' unsystematic approach to external refereeing. Although Brimble and Gale did sometimes consult external referees, papers submitted or recommended by scientists whom the pair trusted were often not sent out for further review. Their successor, John Maddox, would also print papers he admired without external refereeing. It was not until 1973 that editor David Davies made external peer review a requirement for publication in Nature. Nature's example shows that as late as the 1960s a journal could be considered scientifically respectable even if its editors were known to eschew systematic external peer review.
Similar articles
-
Medical journals in the Republic of Macedonia after the Second World War.Prilozi. 2011;32(2):11-31. Prilozi. 2011. PMID: 22286612
-
Making the First Cut: An Analysis of Academic Medicine Editors' Reasons for Not Sending Manuscripts Out for External Peer Review.Acad Med. 2018 Mar;93(3):464-470. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001860. Acad Med. 2018. PMID: 28767495
-
'Keeping in the race': physics, publication speed and national publishing strategies in Nature, 1895-1939.Br J Hist Sci. 2014 Jun;47(173 Pt 2):257-79. doi: 10.1017/s0007087413000381. Br J Hist Sci. 2014. PMID: 24941734
-
A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing.J Neurochem. 2016 Oct;139 Suppl 2:17-23. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13674. Epub 2016 Aug 17. J Neurochem. 2016. PMID: 27534728 Review.
-
Statement on Publication Ethics for Editors and Publishers.J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Sep;31(9):1351-4. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1351. J Korean Med Sci. 2016. PMID: 27510376 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Some remarks on peer review and preprints.Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2023 Jun 26;118:e230001. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760230001. eCollection 2023. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2023. PMID: 37377250 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The misalignment of incentives in academic publishing and implications for journal reform.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Feb 4;122(5):e2401231121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2401231121. Epub 2025 Jan 27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025. PMID: 39869806 Free PMC article.
-
Peer review: the imprimatur of scientific publication.Exp Physiol. 2024 Sep;109(9):1407-1411. doi: 10.1113/EP092108. Epub 2024 Aug 14. Exp Physiol. 2024. PMID: 39143734 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Biomedical publishing: Past historic, present continuous, future conditional.PLoS Biol. 2023 Oct 3;21(10):e3002234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002234. eCollection 2023 Oct. PLoS Biol. 2023. PMID: 37788235 Free PMC article.
-
What feedback do reviewers give when reviewing qualitative manuscripts? A focused mapping review and synthesis.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 18;20(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01005-y. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020. PMID: 32423388 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources