Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2016 Feb;44(2):319-27.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001392.

A Severe Sepsis Mortality Prediction Model and Score for Use With Administrative Data

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

A Severe Sepsis Mortality Prediction Model and Score for Use With Administrative Data

Dee W Ford et al. Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: Administrative data are used for research, quality improvement, and health policy in severe sepsis. However, there is not a sepsis-specific tool applicable to administrative data with which to adjust for illness severity. Our objective was to develop, internally validate, and externally validate a severe sepsis mortality prediction model and associated mortality prediction score.

Design: Retrospective cohort study using 2012 administrative data from five U.S. states. Three cohorts of patients with severe sepsis were created: 1) International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes for severe sepsis/septic shock, 2) Martin approach, and 3) Angus approach. The model was developed and internally validated in International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification, cohort and externally validated in other cohorts. Integer point values for each predictor variable were generated to create a sepsis severity score.

Setting: Acute care, nonfederal hospitals in New York, Maryland, Florida, Michigan, and Washington.

Subjects: Patients in one of three severe sepsis cohorts: 1) explicitly coded (n = 108,448), 2) Martin cohort (n = 139,094), and 3) Angus cohort (n = 523,637) INTERVENTIONS: None.

Measurements and main results: Maximum likelihood estimation logistic regression to develop a predictive model for in-hospital mortality. Model calibration and discrimination assessed via Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit and C-statistics, respectively. Primary cohort subset into risk deciles and observed versus predicted mortality plotted. Goodness-of-fit demonstrated p value of more than 0.05 for each cohort demonstrating sound calibration. C-statistic ranged from low of 0.709 (sepsis severity score) to high of 0.838 (Angus cohort), suggesting good to excellent model discrimination. Comparison of observed versus expected mortality was robust although accuracy decreased in highest risk decile.

Conclusions: Our sepsis severity model and score is a tool that provides reliable risk adjustment for administrative data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Copyright form disclosures: The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Observed Versus Predicted Hospital Mortality and Associated Mortality Ratios by Risk Deciles in Development and Validation Cohorts
Figure 2
Figure 2
Observed versus predicted hospital mortality associated with sepsis severity score by risk decile

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smith EE, Shobha N, Dai D, et al. A Risk Score for In-Hospital Death in Patients Admitted With Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Stroke. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2013;2:e005207. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kansagara D, Englander H, Salanitro A, et al. Risk prediction models for hospital readmission: a systematic review. Jama. 2011 Oct 19;306(15):1688–1698. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Uematsu H, Kunisawa S, Sasaki N, Ikai H, Imanaka Y. Development of a risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality prediction model for community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective analysis using a Japanese administrative database. BMC pulmonary medicine. 2014;14:203. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chang HY, Weiner JP, Richards TM, Bleich SN, Segal JB. Validating the adapted Diabetes Complications Severity Index in claims data. Am J Manag Care. 2012 Nov;18(11):721–726. - PubMed
    1. Knaus WA. APACHE 1978–2001: the development of a quality assurance system based on prognosis: milestones and personal reflections. Arch Surg. 2002 Jan;137(1):37–41. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms