Speech Perception of Elderly Cochlear Implant Users Under Different Noise Conditions
- PMID: 26496670
- DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000883
Speech Perception of Elderly Cochlear Implant Users Under Different Noise Conditions
Abstract
Objective: The primary objective of this study was the comparison of younger and older (>75 yr) CI recipients' performance for speech perception in quiet and in competing continuous and fluctuating noise.
Study design: Prospective, comparative clinical study.
Setting: University hospital.
Patients: Fifty patients, 25 older and 25 younger than 75 years, with a postlingually acquired profound hearing loss who received a cochlear implant at least 1 year before study start were enrolled.
Interventions: Cochlear implantation.
Main outcome measures: We measured speech perception using monosyllable (Freiburg monosyllables) and sentence materials (Göttingen sentences) in quiet. In addition, speech perception for sentences was measured under two different noise conditions: with a continuous, speech-simulating noise signal (CCITT noise) and the FASTL noise (fluctuating noise).
Results: We did not find a significant difference between the performance for younger and the older cohort on speech perception tasks in quiet for Freiburg monosyllables (63.4% ± 20% and 61.7% ± 18.1%, respectively) and for the Göttingen sentences in quiet (73.5% ± 24.3% and 75% ± 25%, respectively). No significant difference was observed for performance between the two age groups when listening in continuous CCITT noise (18.9% ± 24.0% and 29.5% ± 25.2% perception score respectively) or in FASTL noise (27.8% ± 24.2% and 34.4% ± 27.8% perception score, respectively).
Conclusion: There is no supporting evidence from our evaluations of word and sentence perception in quiet and noise that elderly CI users older than 75 years of age perform more poorly than those younger than 75 years of age.
Similar articles
-
Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.Ear Hear. 2013 May-Jun;34(3):324-32. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318272f189. Ear Hear. 2013. PMID: 23263408
-
Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.Otol Neurotol. 2012 Jun;33(4):553-60. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31825367a5. Otol Neurotol. 2012. PMID: 22588233 Clinical Trial.
-
Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Feb;77(2):162-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.10.010. Epub 2012 Nov 6. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013. PMID: 23137855
-
A systematic review of the impact of adjusting input dynamic range (IDR), electrical threshold (T) level and rate of stimulation on speech perception ability in cochlear implant users.Int J Audiol. 2019 Jun;58(6):317-325. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1564844. Epub 2019 Apr 2. Int J Audiol. 2019. PMID: 30939068
-
The relationship between the speech perception and the degree of satisfaction among adult users of cochlear implants.Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Apr;17(2):202-7. doi: 10.7162/S1809-97772013000200014. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013. PMID: 25992014 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Underlying dimensions of real-time word recognition in cochlear implant users.Nat Commun. 2024 Aug 29;15(1):7382. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51514-3. Nat Commun. 2024. PMID: 39209837 Free PMC article.
-
Residual low-frequency hearing after early device activation in cochlear implantation.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Sep;280(9):3977-3985. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07887-0. Epub 2023 Mar 21. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023. PMID: 36943438 Free PMC article.
-
Deep Learning-Based Speech Enhancement With a Loss Trading Off the Speech Distortion and the Noise Residue for Cochlear Implants.Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 8;8:740123. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.740123. eCollection 2021. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021. PMID: 34820392 Free PMC article.
-
Advanced age is not a predictor for cochlear implantation outcomes in adults with moderate to profound sensorineural hearing loss.Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 May-Jun;91(3):101571. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2025.101571. Epub 2025 Mar 21. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2025. PMID: 40120481 Free PMC article.
-
Cochlear implantation in the elderly: outcomes, long-term evolution, and predictive factors.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Apr;275(4):913-922. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4910-y. Epub 2018 Feb 26. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018. PMID: 29480360
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical