Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Nov;75(17):1957-80.
doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0471-1.

Intrathecal Analgesia for Chronic Refractory Pain: Current and Future Prospects

Affiliations
Review

Intrathecal Analgesia for Chronic Refractory Pain: Current and Future Prospects

Catherine Smyth et al. Drugs. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

The intrathecal drug-delivery system (IDDS) is one mode of infusing analgesic medications directly into the cerebrospinal fluid in close proximity to their site of action. This modality has been employed in patients with refractory pain either due to malignant or non-malignant causes for over 30 years. Unfortunately, and despite the number of years it has been in use, there is still a scarcity of rigorous evidence to guide its integration into clinical practice. Current best evidence is inconclusive as to the comparative effectiveness and harms of the IDDS relative to routine medical care of patients. There are far more systematic reviews than high-quality primary comparative studies of the IDDS vs. conventional pain treatment. Existing clinical practice recommendations are best viewed as expert opinion with competing interests. This article will review the existing literature for indications, contraindications, consensus statements, different technologies, and complications of the IDDS. Although approved analgesics for IDDS delivery are limited to morphine and ziconotide, many other analgesics, alone or in combination, are routinely used in this setting. This review will also focus on the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and safety of intrathecal medications extensively used in clinical practice; including agents approved, unapproved, and under development.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Jan-Feb;35(1):64-101 - PubMed
    1. Saudi J Anaesth. 2015 Jan;9(1):71-81 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Pain. 2008 Jan;12(1):132-6 - PubMed
    1. Neuromodulation. 2002 Oct;5(4):208-13 - PubMed
    1. Anesth Analg. 2011 May;112(5):1124-9 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources