Science for a wilder Anthropocene: Synthesis and future directions for trophic rewilding research
- PMID: 26504218
- PMCID: PMC4743824
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1502556112
Science for a wilder Anthropocene: Synthesis and future directions for trophic rewilding research
Abstract
Trophic rewilding is an ecological restoration strategy that uses species introductions to restore top-down trophic interactions and associated trophic cascades to promote self-regulating biodiverse ecosystems. Given the importance of large animals in trophic cascades and their widespread losses and resulting trophic downgrading, it often focuses on restoring functional megafaunas. Trophic rewilding is increasingly being implemented for conservation, but remains controversial. Here, we provide a synthesis of its current scientific basis, highlighting trophic cascades as the key conceptual framework, discussing the main lessons learned from ongoing rewilding projects, systematically reviewing the current literature, and highlighting unintentional rewilding and spontaneous wildlife comebacks as underused sources of information. Together, these lines of evidence show that trophic cascades may be restored via species reintroductions and ecological replacements. It is clear, however, that megafauna effects may be affected by poorly understood trophic complexity effects and interactions with landscape settings, human activities, and other factors. Unfortunately, empirical research on trophic rewilding is still rare, fragmented, and geographically biased, with the literature dominated by essays and opinion pieces. We highlight the need for applied programs to include hypothesis testing and science-based monitoring, and outline priorities for future research, notably assessing the role of trophic complexity, interplay with landscape settings, land use, and climate change, as well as developing the global scope for rewilding and tools to optimize benefits and reduce human-wildlife conflicts. Finally, we recommend developing a decision framework for species selection, building on functional and phylogenetic information and with attention to the potential contribution from synthetic biology.
Keywords: conservation; megafauna; reintroduction; restoration; trophic cascades.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures




Comment in
-
Reply to Rubenstein and Rubenstein: Time to move on from ideological debates on rewilding.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 5;113(1):E2-3. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521891113. Epub 2015 Dec 16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016. PMID: 26676583 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
From Pleistocene to trophic rewilding: A wolf in sheep's clothing.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 5;113(1):E1. doi: 10.1073/iti0116113. Epub 2015 Dec 16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016. PMID: 26676584 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Crutzen PJ. Geology of mankind. Nature. 2002;415(6867):23. - PubMed
-
- Barnosky AD, Koch PL, Feranec RS, Wing SL, Shabel AB. Assessing the causes of late Pleistocene extinctions on the continents. Science. 2004;306(5693):70–75. - PubMed
-
- Dirzo R, et al. Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science. 2014;345(6195):401–406. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases