Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015:2015:136505.
doi: 10.1155/2015/136505. Epub 2015 Oct 4.

Worksite Tobacco Prevention: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Adoption, Dissemination Strategies, and Aggregated Health-Related Outcomes across Companies

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Worksite Tobacco Prevention: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Adoption, Dissemination Strategies, and Aggregated Health-Related Outcomes across Companies

Verena Friedrich et al. Biomed Res Int. 2015.

Abstract

Evidence based public health requires knowledge about successful dissemination of public health measures. This study analyses (a) the changes in worksite tobacco prevention (TP) in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland, between 2007 and 2009; (b1) the results of a multistep versus a "brochure only" dissemination strategy; (b2) the results of a monothematic versus a comprehensive dissemination strategy that aim to get companies to adopt TP measures; and (c) whether worksite TP is associated with health-related outcomes. A longitudinal design with randomized control groups was applied. Data on worksite TP and health-related outcomes were gathered by a written questionnaire (baseline n = 1627; follow-up n = 1452) and analysed using descriptive statistics, nonparametric procedures, and ordinal regression models. TP measures at worksites improved slightly between 2007 and 2009. The multistep dissemination was superior to the "brochure only" condition. No significant differences between the monothematic and the comprehensive dissemination strategies were observed. However, improvements in TP measures at worksites were associated with improvements in health-related outcomes. Although dissemination was approached at a mass scale, little change in the advocated adoption of TP measures was observed, suggesting the need for even more aggressive outreach or an acceptance that these channels do not seem to be sufficiently effective.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Variables to be analysed with regard to changes of worksite TP (research question a), predictors (question b), and outcomes (question c) of worksite TP. Notes.   1Other workplace health promotion measures; 2tobacco prevention; 3pros and cons regarding WHP; 4second-hand smoke.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intervention and study design.

References

    1. World Health Organization. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization (WHO); 2003.
    1. Kramer I., Sockoll I., Bödeker W. Die evidenzbasis für betriebliche gesundheitsförderung und prävention—eine synopse des wissenschaftlichen kenntnisstandes. In: Badura B., Schröder H., Vetter C., editors. Fehlzeiten-Report 2008—Betriebliches Gesundheitsmanagement: Kosten und Nutzen. Vol. 2008. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2009. pp. 65–76. (Fehlzeiten-Report). - DOI
    1. Levy D. T., Chaloupka F., Gitchell J. The effects of tobacco control policies on smoking rates: a tobacco control scorecard. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2004;10(4):338–353. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200407000-00011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Repace J. L., Hyde J. N., Brugge D. Air pollution in Boston bars before and after a smoking ban. BMC Public Health. 2006;6, article 266 doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-266. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kelloway E., Barling J., Weber C. Smoking and absence at work: a quantitative review. In: Koslowsky M., Krausz M., editors. Voluntary Employee Withdrawal and Inattendance: A Current Perspective. New York, NY, USA: Plenum Publishing; 2002. pp. 167–178.

Publication types

MeSH terms