Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Jan 15;122(2):213-21.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.29744. Epub 2015 Oct 27.

The impact of stage, grade, and mucinous histology on the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the appendix: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The impact of stage, grade, and mucinous histology on the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the appendix: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base

Elliot A Asare et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Adenocarcinomas of the appendix represent a heterogeneous disease depending on the presence of mucinous histology, histologic grade, and stage. In the current study, the authors sought to explore the interplay of these factors with systemic chemotherapy in a large population data set.

Methods: Patients in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) who were diagnosed with mucinous, nonmucinous, and signet ring cell-type appendiceal neoplasms from 1985 through 2006 were selected. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were developed.

Results: A total of 11,871 patients met the inclusion criteria for the current study: 50.3% had mucinous neoplasms, 40.5% had nonmucinous neoplasms, and 9.2% had signet ring cell-type neoplasms. The 5-year overall survival (OS) stratified by grade was similar among patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I to stage III disease but not for those with stage IV disease. The median OS for patients with stage IV mucinous and nonmucinous tumors was 6.4 years and 2.3 years, respectively, for those with well differentiated histology (P<.0001) and was 1.5 years and 0.8 years, respectively, for those with poorly differentiated histology (P<.0001). In multivariable modeling for stage I to III disease, adjuvant chemotherapy improved OS for both mucinous and nonmucinous histologies, with hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.78 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.68-0.89 [P = .0002]) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.74-0.94 [P = .002]), respectively. For patients with stage IV disease, systemic chemotherapy significantly improved OS for those with nonmucinous (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.64-0.82 [P<.0001]) but not mucinous (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.86-1.04 [P = .2) histologies, although this was grade-dependent. The median OS for chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy was 6.4 years versus 6.5 years (P value not significant) for patients with mucinous, well-differentiated tumors and 1.6 years versus 1.0 years (P = .0007) for patients with mucinous, poorly differentiated tumors.

Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated a significant OS benefit regardless of histology. However, for patients with stage IV disease, the benefit of systemic chemotherapy varied by tumor histology and grade, with patients with well-differentiated, mucinous, appendiceal adenocarcinomas deriving no survival benefit from systemic chemotherapy. Cancer 2016;122:213-221. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Keywords: appendix; chemotherapy; mucinous; nonmucinous; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: none

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of patient selection for final analysis
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overall survival stratified by (a) histologic type (N=11871), (b) grade (N=11871), (c) stage for mucinous histology (N=5971), and (d) stage for non-mucinous histology (N=4805)
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overall survival stratified by (a) histologic type (N=11871), (b) grade (N=11871), (c) stage for mucinous histology (N=5971), and (d) stage for non-mucinous histology (N=4805)
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overall survival stratified by (a) histologic type (N=11871), (b) grade (N=11871), (c) stage for mucinous histology (N=5971), and (d) stage for non-mucinous histology (N=4805)
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overall survival stratified by (a) histologic type (N=11871), (b) grade (N=11871), (c) stage for mucinous histology (N=5971), and (d) stage for non-mucinous histology (N=4805)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overall survival stratified by stage, histology, and chemotherapy administration: (a) stage II-III mucinous histology (N=2345), (b) stage II-III non-mucinous histology (N=2520), (c) well differentiated stage IV (N=1149), (d) moderately differentiated stage IV (N=974), and (e) poorly differentiated stage IV (N=786)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overall survival stratified by stage, histology, and chemotherapy administration: (a) stage II-III mucinous histology (N=2345), (b) stage II-III non-mucinous histology (N=2520), (c) well differentiated stage IV (N=1149), (d) moderately differentiated stage IV (N=974), and (e) poorly differentiated stage IV (N=786)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overall survival stratified by stage, histology, and chemotherapy administration: (a) stage II-III mucinous histology (N=2345), (b) stage II-III non-mucinous histology (N=2520), (c) well differentiated stage IV (N=1149), (d) moderately differentiated stage IV (N=974), and (e) poorly differentiated stage IV (N=786)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overall survival stratified by stage, histology, and chemotherapy administration: (a) stage II-III mucinous histology (N=2345), (b) stage II-III non-mucinous histology (N=2520), (c) well differentiated stage IV (N=1149), (d) moderately differentiated stage IV (N=974), and (e) poorly differentiated stage IV (N=786)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overall survival stratified by stage, histology, and chemotherapy administration: (a) stage II-III mucinous histology (N=2345), (b) stage II-III non-mucinous histology (N=2520), (c) well differentiated stage IV (N=1149), (d) moderately differentiated stage IV (N=974), and (e) poorly differentiated stage IV (N=786)

References

    1. McCusker ME, Cote TR, Clegg LX, Sobin LH. Primary malignant neoplasms of the appendix: a population-based study from the surveillance, epidemiology and end-results program, 1973-1998. Cancer. 2002;94:3307–3312. - PubMed
    1. Smeenk RM, van Velthuysen ML, Verwaal VJ, Zoetmulder FA. Appendiceal neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei: a population based study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:196–201. - PubMed
    1. Stephen B, Edge CCC, Fritz April G, Greene Frederick L, Trotti Andy III, Byrd David, editors. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. New York, NY: Springer; 2011. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual.
    1. Connor SJ, Hanna GB, Frizelle FA. Appendiceal tumors: retrospective clinicopathologic analysis of appendiceal tumors from 7,970 appendectomies. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:75–80. - PubMed
    1. Benedix F, Reimer A, Gastinger I, Mroczkowski P, Lippert H, Kube R. Primary appendiceal carcinoma--epidemiology, surgery and survival: results of a German multi-center study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010;36:763–771. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms