Superfetation in live-bearing fishes is not always the result of a morphological constraint
- PMID: 26508151
- DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3477-1
Superfetation in live-bearing fishes is not always the result of a morphological constraint
Abstract
Superfetation is an unusual reproductive strategy that consists of the presence of multiple broods at different developmental stages within a single female. One hypothesis that was proposed to explain its adaptive significance suggests that, in fishes, superfetation is a response to selective pressures that promote a thin and streamlined body shape, such as high-velocity water systems. Superfetation may allow for reduction in ovary size and hence improve streamlining because superfetating females carry few large, full-term embryos at any given time. We tested this morphological constraint hypothesis using reproductive and morphological data from several populations of two viviparous fishes of the family Poeciliidae (Poeciliopsis gracilis and Poeciliopsis infans). We found no evidence to support the morphological constraint hypothesis. In both species the degree of superfetation varied as a function of a complex interaction between source population and female size, and this interpopulation variation was not associated with the velocity of the water current. Contrary to what we expected, females of P. gracilis with more streamlined bodies were observed in rivers where water velocity is slow or moderate. In P. infans the velocity of the water current did not predict variation in body shape. Our results are noteworthy because a previous study which focused on a congeneric species (Poeciliopsis turrubarensis) demonstrated strong support for this hypothesis. However, based on our evidence we conclude that the association among increased superfetation, streamlined morphologies, and fast-flowing environments is not a general rule and that the adaptive value of superfetation may differ among species.
Keywords: Life histories; Poeciliidae; Poeciliopsis; Simultaneous broods; Water velocity.
Similar articles
-
Superfetation reduces the negative effects of pregnancy on the fast-start escape performance in live-bearing fish.Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Dec 4;286(1916):20192245. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2245. Epub 2019 Nov 27. Proc Biol Sci. 2019. PMID: 31771468 Free PMC article.
-
Multiple paternity in superfetatious live-bearing fishes.J Evol Biol. 2022 Jul;35(7):948-961. doi: 10.1111/jeb.14019. Epub 2022 May 25. J Evol Biol. 2022. PMID: 35612319
-
Morphological structures for potential sperm storage in poeciliid fishes. Does superfetation matter?J Morphol. 2017 Jul;278(7):907-918. doi: 10.1002/jmor.20684. Epub 2017 Apr 11. J Morphol. 2017. PMID: 28401572
-
The concept of superfetation: a critical review on a 'myth' in mammalian reproduction.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011 Feb;86(1):77-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00135.x. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011. PMID: 20394608 Review.
-
[Superfecundation and superfetation--the forgotten entities].Harefuah. 2008 Feb;147(2):155-8, 181. Harefuah. 2008. PMID: 18357675 Review. Hebrew.
Cited by
-
Why do placentas evolve? Evidence for a morphological advantage during pregnancy in live-bearing fish.PLoS One. 2018 Apr 16;13(4):e0195976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195976. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29659620 Free PMC article.
-
Coasting in live-bearing fish: the drag penalty of being pregnant.J R Soc Interface. 2019 Feb 28;16(151):20180714. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0714. J R Soc Interface. 2019. PMID: 30958187 Free PMC article.
-
Superfetation reduces the negative effects of pregnancy on the fast-start escape performance in live-bearing fish.Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Dec 4;286(1916):20192245. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2245. Epub 2019 Nov 27. Proc Biol Sci. 2019. PMID: 31771468 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources