Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2016 Sep;30(5):457-63.
doi: 10.1002/jcla.21879. Epub 2015 Oct 29.

Modified HPLC-ESI-MS Method for Glycated Hemoglobin Quantification Based on the IFCC Reference Measurement Procedure and Its Application for Quantitative Analyses in Clinical Laboratories of China

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Modified HPLC-ESI-MS Method for Glycated Hemoglobin Quantification Based on the IFCC Reference Measurement Procedure and Its Application for Quantitative Analyses in Clinical Laboratories of China

Zhixin Song et al. J Clin Lab Anal. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The level of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c ) has been recognized as an important indicator of long-term glycemic control. However, the HbA1c measurement is not currently included as a diagnostic determinant in China. Current study aims to assess a candidate modified International Federation of Clinical Chemistry reference method for the forthcoming standardization of HbA1c measurements in China.

Methods: The HbA1c concentration was measured using a modified high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-MS) method. The modified method replaces the propylcyanide column with a C18 reversed-phase column, which has a lower cost and is more commonly used in China, and uses 0.1% (26.5 mmol/l) formic acid instead of trifluoroacetic acid. Moreover, in order to minimize matrix interference and reduce the running time, a solid-phase extraction was employed. The discrepancies between HbA1c measurements using conventional methods and the HPLC-ESI-MS method were clarified in clinical samples from healthy people and diabetic patients. Corresponding samples were distributed to 89 hospitals in Beijing for external quality assessment.

Results: The linearity, reliability, and accuracy of the modified HPLC-ESI-MS method with a shortened running time of 6 min were successfully validated. Out of 89 hospitals evaluated, the relative biases of HbA1c concentrations were < 8% for 74 hospitals and < 5% for 60 hospitals. Compared with other conventional methods, HbA1c concentrations determined by HPLC methods were similar to the values obtained from the current HPLC-ESI-MS method.

Conclusion: The HPLC-ESI-MS method represents an improvement over existing methods and provides a simple, stable, and rapid HbA1c measurement with strong signal intensities and reduced ion suppression.

Keywords: diabetes; external quality assessment; glycated hemoglobin; high-performance liquid chromatography; mass spectrometry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Standard curve of the current modified HPLC–ESI–MS method for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). The peak areas of HbA1c and HbA0 were measured with the modified HPLC–ESI–MS method. The percentage concentrations of HbA1c in the standard curve were 0, 36.7, 66, 88.7, and 118 mmol/mol. Each standard was measured three times, and the mean value was used to plot the standard curve. HPLC–ESI–MS, high‐performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–mass spectrometry.
Figure 2
Figure 2
External quality assessments. Hemolysate samples A: 0901 and B: 0903 were tested by clinical laboratories in 89 hospitals. The accepted relative bias was ±8%, labeled by the upper and lower red lines.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Reliability of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) measurements. The reliability of HbA1c measurements from the external quality assessments was validated by comparing values from two batches of samples (Nos. 0901 and 0903) obtained by the 89 clinical laboratories. The assigned values of HbA1c% by the modified high‐performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–mass spectrometry method were 32.46 and 74.32 mmol/mol, for Nos. 0901 and 0903, respectively; the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) values were calculated to be 5.12% and 8.95%, respectively, according to the following equation NGSP(%) = 0.0915 × IFCC + 2.15 mmol/mol.

References

    1. Krishnamurti U, Steffes MW. Glycohemoglobin: A primary predictor of the development or reversal of complications of diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem 2001;47(7):1157–1165. - PubMed
    1. Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2010;87(1):4–14. - PubMed
    1. Larsen ML, Horder M, Mogensen EF. Effect of long‐term monitoring of glycosylated hemoglobin levels in insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus. New Engl J Med 1990;323(15):1021–1025. - PubMed
    1. Dinneen S, Gerich J, Rizza R. Carbohydrate metabolism in non‐insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus. New Engl J Med 1992;327(10):707–713. - PubMed
    1. Weykamp C, John WG, Mosca A, et al. The IFCC reference measurement system for HbA1c: A 6‐year progress report. Clin Chem 2008;54(2):240–248. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources