Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct 29:14:144.
doi: 10.1186/s12933-015-0306-0.

Combined influence of nonalcoholic fatty liver and body size phenotypes on diabetes risk

Affiliations

Combined influence of nonalcoholic fatty liver and body size phenotypes on diabetes risk

Tingting Du et al. Cardiovasc Diabetol. .

Abstract

Background: We aimed to determine the association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and diabetes risk among body size phenotypes which was based on cross-classification of body mass index (BMI) categories (normal or overweight/obesity) and metabolic status (metabolically health or metabolically at-risk).

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using a cohort of 10,761 apparently healthy Chinese adults who underwent comprehensive health checkups including abdominal ultrasonography. Subjects were classified as metabolically at-risk by having any two of the following, consistent with the Adult Treatment Panel-III metabolic syndrome definition: (1) systolic/diastolic blood pressure ≥130/85 mmHg, (2) triglycerides ≥1.7 mmol/L, (3) fasting blood glucose ≥5.6 mmol/L, (4) HDL-cholesterol ≥1.0/1.3 mmol/L for men/women.

Results: Among participants without metabolically at-risk, multivariate-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for diabetes from NAFLD compared with those without NAFLD in the normal-weight (BMI <23 kg/m(2)) and overweight/obese (BMI ≥23 kg/m(2)) group were 2.10 (1.85-3.93) and 1.85 (1.35-2.53), respectively. Among participants with metabolically at-risk, the significant association between NAFLD and diabetes was lost, regardless of obesity status. There were only 27.1% subjects with the presence of the three factors (overweight/obesity, NAFLD, and metabolically at-risk) occurring together, while the three factors occurring together was common (56.16%) in diabetic individuals. The multivariate-adjusted ORs for diabetes were 1.1 (0.61-1.98) for overweight/obesity, 2.23 (1.05-5.14) for NAFLD, and 8.04 (5.0-12.09) for metabolically at-risk. The OR for the presence of all the three factors occurring together was 23.22 (13.96-38.63).

Conclusions: NAFLD was associated with diabetes risk among participants without metabolically at-risk. The clustering of overweight/obesity, NAFLD, and metabolically at-risk is common in diabetic subjects and strikingly and markedly increases the diabetes risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Venn Diagrams for concordance between obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or between metabolically at-risk and NAFLD. Venn Diagram for a visual display of NAFLD and overweight/obesity based on BMI ≥23 kg/m2 in the whole population (a); Venn Diagram for a visual display of NAFLD and metabolically at-risk in the whole population (b). Metabolic risk indicates metabolically at-risk. Metabolically at-risk was defined in the Definition section
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Venn diagram for a visual display of how the three factors (overweight/obesity, NAFLD, and metabolically at-risk) cluster together. Metabolic risk indicates metabolically at-risk. Overweight/obesity, NAFLD, and metabolically at-risk were defined in the definition Section
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Combined effect of the presence of NAFLD and body size phenotypes on diabetes risk. Combined effect of the presence of NAFLD and body size phenotypes on the frequency of diabetes (a); Combined effect of the presence of NAFLD and body size phenotypes on the odds of diabetes (b). Odds ratios (95 % confidence intervals) of diabetes for participants categorized by cross-classification of four body size phenotypes and either the presence or absence of NAFLD were adjusted for age, sex, and triglycerides/HDL cholesterol. MHNW metabolically healthy normal weight, MHO metabolically healthy overweight or obese, MANW metabolically at-risk normal weight, and MAO metabolically at-risk overweight or obese. Each of the four body size phenotypes was defined in the definition section

References

    1. Du T, Sun X, Yin P, Yuan G, Zhang M, Zhou X, Yu X. Secular trends in the prevalence of low risk factor burden for cardiovascular disease according to obesity status among Chinese adults, 1993-2009. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:961. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-961. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Talley NJ, Locke GR, Moayyedi P, West JJ, Ford AC, Saito YA. GI epidemiology: diseases and clinical methodology. West Sussex: Wiley; 2013.
    1. Browning JD, Szczepaniak LS, Dobbins R, Nuremberg P, Horton JD, Cohen JC, Grundy SM, Hobbs HH. Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: impact of ethnicity. Hepatology. 2004;40:1387–1395. doi: 10.1002/hep.20466. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fabbrini E, Sullivan S, Klein S. Obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: biochemical, metabolic, and clinical implications. Hepatology. 2010;51:679–689. doi: 10.1002/hep.23280. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sinn DH, Gwak GY, Park HN, Kim JE, Min YW, Kim KM, Kim YJ, Choi MS, Lee JH, Koh KC, et al. Ultrasonographically detected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is an independent predictor for identifying patients with insulin resistance in non-obese, non-diabetic middle-aged Asian adults. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:561–567. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.400. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources