Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2016 Jan;12(1):129-35.
doi: 10.5664/jcsm.5412.

The Evolution of the AASM Clinical Practice Guidelines: Another Step Forward

Timothy I Morgenthaler  1 , Ludmila Deriy  2 , Jonathan L Heald  2 , Sherene M Thomas  2
Affiliations
Practice Guideline

The Evolution of the AASM Clinical Practice Guidelines: Another Step Forward

Timothy I Morgenthaler et al. J Clin Sleep Med. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

One of the goals of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) is to provide clear, evidence-based recommendations in our clinical practice guidelines. Periodically, the AASM will assess and update the process by which these guidelines are developed so that it is in line with the standards currently being used for guideline development. The AASM is now taking the next step forward by fully adopting GRADE (Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation) as the methodology used for evaluating evidence and forming clinical practice guidelines recommendations. Starting this year, AASM recommendations will be based on the following four interdependent domains: 1. quality of evidence; 2. balance of desirable and undesirable consequences; 3. patients' values and preferences; and 4. resource use (when known). AASM strengths of recommendations will be dichotomized into two categories: "Strong" and "Weak," either for or against a patient-care strategy. In an effort to provide clarity and transparency, all AASM recommendations will be actionable statements that include the specific patient population for which the patient-care strategy is recommended, and clearly define the comparator against which the patient-care strategy was evaluated. In some recommendations, the comparator will be an alternative patient-care strategy (e.g., a "gold standard" or previously available alternative), while in other recommendations the comparator will be a placebo or no treatment; this is determined by the availability of evidence, and analyses decisions made by the AASM task force. Implementation of the complete GRADE criteria by the AASM allows us the best path forward towards continuing to provide high quality clinical practice guidelines.

Keywords: GRADE; guidelines; sleep.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. An overview of using GRADE to make recommendations.
Figure 2
Figure 2. How GRADE is used to determine quality of evidence for individual outcomes.
Figure 3
Figure 3. The complexity of determining the direction and strength of a recommendation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Aurora RN, Morgenthaler TI. On the goodness of recommendations: the changing face of practice parameters. Sleep. 2010;33:1273–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aurora RN, Casey KR, Kristo D, et al. Practice parameters for the surgical modifications of the upper airway for obstructive sleep apnea in adults. Sleep. 2010;33:1408–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Schunemann HJ, Tugwell P, Knottnerus A. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:380–2. - PubMed
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:395–400. - PubMed
    1. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:401–6. - PubMed

Publication types