Clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with everolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents (EXAMINATION): 5-year results of a randomised trial
- PMID: 26520230
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00548-6
Clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with everolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents (EXAMINATION): 5-year results of a randomised trial
Abstract
Background: Data for the safety and efficacy of new-generation drug-eluting stents at long-term follow-up, and specifically in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, are scarce. In the EXAMINATION trial, we compared everolimus-eluting stents (EES) with bare-metal stents (BMS) in an all-comer population with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. In this study, we assessed the 5-year outcomes of the population in the EXAMINATION trial.
Methods: In the multicentre EXAMINATION trial, done in Italy, Spain, and the Netherlands, patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive EES or BMS. The random allocation schedule was computer-generated and central randomisation (by telephone) was used to allocate patients in blocks of four or six, stratified by centre. Patients were masked to treatment assignment. At 5 years, we assessed the combined patient-oriented outcome of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularisation. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00828087.
Findings: 1498 patients were randomly assigned to receive either EES (n=751) or BMS (n=747). At 5 years, complete clinical follow-up data were obtained for 731 patients treated with EES and 727 treated with BMS (97% of both groups). The patient-oriented endpoint occurred in 159 (21%) patients in the EES group versus 192 (26%) in the BMS group (hazard ratio 0·80, 95% CI 0·65-0·98; p=0·033). This difference was mainly driven by a reduced rate of all-cause mortality (65 [9%] vs 88 [12%]; 0·72, 0·52-0·10; p=0·047).
Interpretation: Our findings should be taken as a point of reference for the assessment of new bioresorbable polymer-based metallic stents or bioresorbable scaffolds in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Funding: Spanish Heart Foundation.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Long-term EXAMINATION of drug-eluting stents in acute myocardial infarction.Lancet. 2016 Jan 23;387(10016):316-318. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00677-7. Epub 2015 Oct 29. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 26520232 No abstract available.
-
Outcomes in the EXAMINATION trial.Lancet. 2016 May 14;387(10032):1997-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30464-0. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 27203771 No abstract available.
-
Outcomes in the EXAMINATION trial - Authors' reply.Lancet. 2016 May 14;387(10032):1998. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30071-X. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 27203777 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical

