Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Nov;148(5):782-92.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.05.020.

Factors influencing molar relationship behavior in the mixed dentition

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Factors influencing molar relationship behavior in the mixed dentition

Sérgio Estelita Barros et al. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: Our objectives were to compare different patterns of molar relationship changes from the mixed dentition to the permanent dentition and to discriminate the contributing dentoskeletal factors.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we used a sample selected from 1212 untreated subjects who were longitudinally followed from the mixed to the permanent dentition. Eighty subjects (mean age, 8.69 years) had their right and left dental arch sides divided into 6 groups, according to molar relationship behavior: distal step kept in Class II (group 1A) or changed to Class I (group 1B); flush terminal plane kept in Class II (group 2A) or changed to Class I (group 2B); and mesial step kept in Class I (group 3A) or changed to Class III (group 3B). The groups were statistically evaluated at P <0.05.

Results: Class I and Class II defined by mesial and distal steps were stable. The flush terminal plane groups had a similar probability of maintaining the Class II relationship or changing to Class I. Groups 2A and 2B had significantly different changes in molar relationship, maxillary width, and mandibular skeletal traits as a whole. Class II maxillomandibular discrepancy, maxillary narrowing, and sagittal mandibular deficiency were the disadvantageous factors for favorable molar relationship adjustment.

Conclusions: Mesial and distal steps produced stable molar relationships from the mixed to the permanent dentition. There were 2 distinct dentoskeletal parameters of subjects with flush terminal planes regarding transverse maxillary and sagittal mandibular dimensions that should be diagnosed early to define the prognosis for molar relationship adjustment and orthodontic treatment need.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Concerns about combining samples.
    Ghazal T. Ghazal T. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Jun;149(6):777. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.03.008. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27241980 No abstract available.
  • Authors' response.
    Barros SE, Janson G, Chiqueto K. Barros SE, et al. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Jun;149(6):777-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.03.007. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27241981 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources