Management of type II unruptured cesarean scar pregnancy: Comparison of gestational mass excision and uterine artery embolization combined with methotrexate
- PMID: 26522097
- DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2015.08.002
Management of type II unruptured cesarean scar pregnancy: Comparison of gestational mass excision and uterine artery embolization combined with methotrexate
Abstract
Objective: This research was carried out to investigate the effectiveness, rationality, and safety of laparotomy management compared with uterine artery embolization (UAE) combined with methotrexate (MTX) for the treatment of deep implantation cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP II).
Materials and methods: Data from 29 patients seen between June 2008 and February 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the surgery group and the UAE combined with MTX group according to the treatment they received. We compared the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes between the two groups.
Results: The patients' clinical characteristics did not differ between the surgery group and the UAE combined with MTX group. However, the mean blood loss was decreased in the surgery group compared with the UAE combined with MTX group (90 ± 4.5 mL vs. 286 ± 5.2 mL, p < 0.05). No patients required blood transfusion in the surgery group, whereas two patients in the UAE combined with MTX group received blood transfusions. The length of time for the serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) level to normalize, the time required for the disappearance of the gestational mass, and the duration of hospital stay were significantly less in the surgery group than in the UAE combined with MTX group (13.7 ± 1.0 days vs. 40.7 ± 1.7 days, 7.1 ± 1.3 days vs. 135.4 ± 6.7 days, and 11.0 ± 1.2 days vs. 41.4 ± 3.2 days, respectively; p < 0.01). Although the treatment success rate did not differ significantly between the two groups, the success rate was 100% for the surgery group and 73% for the UAE combined with MTX group.
Conclusion: Surgical treatment can remove gestational masses and allow wound repair. Moreover, laparotomy is available in almost all hospitals. Thus, surgery can be an effective and reasonable treatment for CSP II.
Keywords: cesarean scar pregnancy; laparotomy; uterine artery embolization.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Similar articles
-
Caesarean scar pregnancy: comparative efficacy and safety of treatment by uterine artery chemoembolization and systemic methotrexate injection.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Mar;161(1):75-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.11.026. Epub 2011 Dec 5. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012. PMID: 22153905
-
[Comparison of the safety of two treatment methods of cesarean scar pregnancy of typeⅡ and Ⅲ in menopause within 7 weeks].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jul 25;52(7):449-454. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.07.004. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017. PMID: 28797151 Chinese.
-
[Management of cesarean scar pregnancy by hysteroscopy combined with uterine artery embolism].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Aug;46(8):591-4. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2011. PMID: 22169517 Chinese.
-
Uterine artery embolization combined with methotrexate in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: results of a case series and review of the literature.J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012 Dec;23(12):1582-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.08.013. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012. PMID: 23177105 Review.
-
Interventions for non-tubal ectopic pregnancy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 1;7(7):CD011174. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011174.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32609376 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Cesarean section scar pregnancy: Challenges in choosing treatment approach.Clin Case Rep. 2021 Aug 16;9(8):e04592. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.4592. eCollection 2021 Aug. Clin Case Rep. 2021. PMID: 34429990 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE) versus Laparoscopic Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Debridement Surgery (LCSPDS) in Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.Med Sci Monit. 2018 Jul 6;24:4659-4666. doi: 10.12659/MSM.907404. Med Sci Monit. 2018. PMID: 29978852 Free PMC article.
-
Uterine Artery Embolization Combined with Subsequent Suction Evacuation as Low-Risk Treatment for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Dec 14;11(12):2350. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122350. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34943587 Free PMC article.
-
Type II caesarean scar pregnancy management by ultrasound-guided local lauromacrogol injection in combination with suction curettage: A case report.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Apr;99(17):e19743. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019743. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32332613 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the treatment of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Sep;306(3):769-777. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06487-3. Epub 2022 Mar 18. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022. PMID: 35303150
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical